"stuart noble" screens, having the case under the monitor makes more sense.
Tis the way it used to be.
As I can't put my monitor on the case anymore, it's currently on a couple of books (FWIW windows programming stuff that I no longer do, oops sorry, that should be Windows(TM) according to MS)
I don't have a problem with CR, I use my pinkie for it (and right Shift).
You shouldn't put CRs in email (even more so with Usenet posts), except at the end of a paragraph (that's the only place my posts have them), so that the recipients mail reader can format it to the screen/window width. If you put CRs in at, say, 80 characters and the message gets quoted a few times, so each line starts '> > > ', it becomes 86 chars so someone whose mail window is only 82 chars wide will get the dreaded long line, short line syndrome.
It was Perl actually ;-) I said _except COBOL_ because COBOL uses plain English:
"Parish" wrote | Mary Fisher wrote: | > I believe that, along with driving, keyboard skills are essential | > parts of life and everyone should be taught them - but taught well. | > You might think that you'll never need them but it's best to be | > prepared and few people will be able to escape. Being able to do | > something efficiently gives confidence when it's needed.
I do agree. I used to know someone who could touch-type from copy at 96 wpm with perfect accuracy. It really does make using a computer so much more efficient and pleasant (even though I'm not a proper t-typist myself).
| I get the impression that most typing courses are designed for | office work, i.e. plain English, so would any of these courses | be likely to train you properly to use the whole of a PC keyboard?
They should train you which finger to use for every key, although you'll get most practice on the 'typewriter' characters and lads who can cart all ash and sand.
| Here's an example; would you have any trouble touch typing this? | while (@row = $sth->fetchrow) { | for ($i = 0; $i
Typing can be rather like playing music - you look at the note, and the fingers automatically go to the correct position.
We had to type to John Phillip Sousa marches. I taught some of the girls to syncopate. Mr McKenzie was furious, but he couldn't figure out who was doing it.
/* printf("Welcome to Windows 3.11"); */ /* printf("Welcome to Windows 95"); */ printf("Welcome to Windows 98"); if (system_ok()) crash(to_dos_prompt); else system_memory = open("a:\swp0001.swp", O_CREATE);
That might be how you send it, but Google thinks you have line breaks after 'except', 'so' etc.
And I see 'except' on a line by itself.
Even if you managed to avoid CRs in the first post, everyone else would add a new quote mark before the previous quote marks, and so add to the length of each quoted line. Therefore the first quoter needs to have short lines, and preferable the original post.
That sounds wrong to me. Your posting, as it arrived here, contained line breaks exactly where you see them above. I believe that you didn't type them, but I think you'll find that your software inserted them automatically before the message left your PC.
I'm glad you posted that, I saw line breaks in different places. That points the finger at the transmission rather than the posting software, but the effect on the readers is the same - lines which look bad after a few quotes.
Agreed. That's why I wrote "line break" and not "carriage return".
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Without examining things in much closer detail I couldn't tell you what mechanisms are used to represent a line break at each of the many stages that a message goes through between your keyboard and my screen; and there would be no point in my doing so. It's not as if a CR is created under your Enter key and reappears on my monitor. The exact characters or whatever don't matter, it's the effects (line breaks) that matter.
Mea culpa. I worded it badlay and also I was thinking of two different things (CR as in literally pressing RETURN, and format=flowed).
Let me try again....
When typing in the compose editor you shouldn't hit RETURN except at the end of a paragraph else if you go back and edit your text you will alter the line length. Your e-mail client should have a setting for line length and it should insert line breaks which, if I remember RFC822 correctly should be a LF-CR pair, it inserts _when it sends the message_. Normally you should set this value to ~70 to allow for subsequent quoting, however if the quoting levels get too deep you will still have problems. That is why "format=flowed" was created; the mail client still inserts line breaks at X characters whe it sends the message, but it adds a trailing SPACE to the end of the text. If the recipients mail client understands format=flowed (and it hasn't been disabled) then it will re-flow the text of each quoted message to fit the window width (maintianing a constant line length), strip the quote chars ('> '), and show the quoting levels by indenting the text, most will also add a vertical coloured bar, or bars, at the left hand end of each line to the indicate quote level (like Outlook (and OE?) does with the quoted message when you Forward it) so you see:
| Original message | || Reply to original || ||| Reply to reply ||| |||| Reply to reply to reply ||||
but you don't get the long line - short line problem where the short line is unquoted.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.