Cavity wall insulation

I have tried in the past to have our cavity walls insulated but to no avail as the surveyor deemed our outer stone skin to have too rough/irregular an inner surface for the either fibre or bead materials available to work properly. One said it might work with beads but said they would not guarantee the work for the same reason.

I have now come across "Foamseal" and have their brochure in front of me where "Random stone walls" are one of the ticked applications.

Have any of you used or heard of them?

Mike

Reply to
Muddymike
Loading thread data ...

On Tuesday 18 February 2014 12:02 Muddymike wrote in uk.d-i-y:

Does it still have the problems it did in the 70's (giving the occupiers headaches for weeks afterwards)?

Reply to
Tim Watts

On Tuesday 18 February 2014 12:02 Muddymike wrote in uk.d-i-y:

Do tell more, I'm not familiar with that story. Anyone else aware?

Mike

Reply to
Muddymike

I don't know this specific company/product, but urea formaldehyde foam was in use as a cavity filler longs before beads, etc. were used. The cavity walls in my house[1] were filled with it about 35 years ago. It certainly finds its way into every nook and cranny. If it's the same product, it should be ok for irregular stone walls. It doesn't smell very nice, but the smell goes off after a while.

[1] As it was then. The cavities of subsequent extensions have been filled with fibreglass batts at build time
Reply to
Roger Mills

On Tuesday 18 February 2014 13:17 Muddymike wrote in uk.d-i-y:

Can't I'm afraid - but I do recally it being all over the telly.

I would certainly do some research and googling if I were you.

Reply to
Tim Watts

The brochure states (Contains no Formaldehyde) so perhaps this is different material!

Mike

Reply to
Muddymike

In days of yore, the foam used evolved formalin gas which sometiomes found it's way into the house. V bad for you.

Modern foam uses refrigerant gases, less harmfull Or CO2

Reply to
harryagain

Didn't this use Urea Formadhyde foam .. ? and the fumes gave the headaches until it had fully set and fumed off.

Reply to
Rick Hughes

formatting link
and scroll down to Urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, Safety concerns and Health effects.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

In message , harryagain writes

We had foam insulation in early 80s done by ICI (ISTR) and no problems. There were a few cowboys around as ever who do didn't prepare the foam correctly and it slowly evaporated. Councils set up a testing facility so you could have it checked. Then the government decided it wasn't a problem anymore and so they got rid of the test equipment so yo couldn't prove them wrong.

Reply to
bert

AIUI random stone cavities are not recommended for CWI because there have b een too many cases of damp problems resulting. Theres probably more to that story than I know though. A plus of polystyrene bead is you can install it without glue, and if problems result, simply vacuum it out. Its also easy to do, so the ideal diy CWI for questionable walls. And yes, they do go eve rywhere!

NT

Reply to
meow2222

I recall cases of "sick buildings" which resulted from certain types of foam product. Don't think I ever knew the details cause, and it certainly was not universal with all foam insulation.

Reply to
John Rumm

Was that not outgassing of formaldehyde or something? If they use a different material then that should not be the issue I'd have thought.

Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

After a while the gas has all dispersed. It's not used anymore so no need for testing. It used to leak into the house through cracks around window and door openings etc. So ideally, a bead of silicon around the wood/plaster joint would fix the problem.

Reply to
harryagain

In message , harryagain writes

That was the idiotic argument used at the time. The testing was for pre installed foam which could deteriorate over a number of years.

In worst cases the gas didn't disperse until all the foam had evaporated.

Reply to
bert

All the foam evaporated??????????? What would be the point in putting it in?

Reply to
harryagain

In message , harryagain writes

Which bit of "In worst cases" do you not understand?

Reply to
bert

I can't imagine the foam evaporating.

Reply to
harryagain

In message , harryagain writes

I can't be held responsible for the limits of your imagination.

Reply to
bert

I have my first quote for the foam cavity fill. Total cost £5684, Grant available approx. £3,200 leaving me to pay about £2484.

Just waiting for the second quote and confirmed grant amount before deciding.

Mike

Reply to
Muddymike

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.