I suspect that reality, in the form of a chat with Building Control, will rather kybosh this approach; introduce the party wall act & stipulate the only worthwhile route... Unless of course you successfully build it by stealth & keep it secret for a few years....
4" celotex, gouged out for wires and pipes and made good with expanding foam, foil tapeed to the studs for vapour barrier.
use 4" stud and then plate with strawboard wood - the really cheap structural chipboard. Then shove thin pb on top. That will make hanging the....
....much easier.
Dont forget and extractor fan
Building control dicattes that
First of all the easy way to build this is inside out. Put up the stufdwork cover the ouside with semi permeable, whack in nails and use those to key the external cladding brickwork to it
Building control will dictate the foundations.
use a strawboard roof, and get a pro in to pop the roof ing on - there is an expensive hot sealed rubber memberane thing that is te dogs bollox.
You will be les thanb a double cavity in 3width, but not a lot. It will be a lot cheaper however, and very easy to mount off the strawboard.
Nah. You make the studwork structural and use the bricks as cladding. Its standard practice.
Studs with a stressed skin (strawboard) outer is usual, then a membrane tacked on, then some kind of support nailed on to key the blockwork too. Or you can clad with fake timber cladding that never needs painting.
PS I just realised that what I mean by strawboard is strictly sterling board.
"which meets any regs" which was shorthand for "which meets any appropriate regs" which is shorthand again for "meets all appropriate regs".
From a structural point of view, single-brick garages don't seen to fall down very often. But some modest buttresses would be OK as long as they don't prejudice the insulation value. Any vertical loading applied inside would be carried by the studwork, so we are mainly interested in the brick wall not topping over.
In message <qef7mg$l3f$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me, at 07:05:04 on Thu, 20 Jun
2019, The Natural Philosopher snipped-for-privacy@invalid.invalid remarked:
But would they be less than a classic all-brick cavity wall?
Unfortunately there's no access to the outside, because it's up against a fence (that's the main reason it has no windows[1]). But I'm told the planning people still need it to be brick (conservation area, red line etc etc), in case the fence falls down and people can see it.
[1] In that wall, ventilation will be in other walls.
I think you need to talk to Building Control. They are presumably going to want to see standard footings and buttresses (for single skin). I wonder if they will accept buttresses "on the inside" to maximise your available space? How will you point it with no access from the outside?
For an existing building, you need to achieve a U value for a new wall of 0.28 or better, have a poke around with a calculator, e.g.
formatting link
An 89mm timber-framed wall, with 50mm PIR insulation between studs (obviously you could go up to the full stud depth to improve it), external brick skin and 32.5mm PIR backed plasterboard inside can meet it, not any less thick than an insulated brick/block cavity wall though ...
If you are building so close to the boundary that you cannot access the wall externally from your property I wonder if the end result will satisfy the requirements of a conservation are as to appearance (which is not just a matter of the bricks).
Unheated flat roofs, like commercial garage prmises used this stuff because it has some insulative properties, so avoids the condensation problems in cold weather.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.