Bathtub capacity, combi sizing, Ecobollocks

Mar 30, 2019 Last reply: 7 years ago 31 Replies

I was idly contemplating combi boiler sizing, and if you should size for the number of radiators or the time to fill a bath.



Rationale being that in a small house or a large house a standard bath is likely to be the same size but the heating demand is likely to be very different.



I looked for the average size of a bath tub.



formatting link

claimed that a bath was 80 litres but an electric shower used 62 litres in an 8 minute shower. Rough maths suggest that if this is true the electric shower could fill the bath in 10 minutes.



Please note that I'm not convinced by that. Nor, really that an average bath tub is of a similar size to an average car petrol tank. I class the above article as Ecobollocks.



formatting link
looks more realistic, with a standard(ish) UK bath holding around 200 litres (although obviously it all depends on how deeply you fill your bath).

So for sake of argument if you wanted to put 150 litres of hot water into a bath in 10 minutes you would need a flow rate of 15 litres per minute (I am ignoring things like maximum comfortable temperature, rate of cooling whilst filling etc.).



Using

formatting link
as a rough guide I have a bit of a problem because they rate a 2 bed property with 10 (normal size?) radiators.



3 beds, bathroom, hall (but not on landing), kitchen, dining, living gives me 8 radiators.

Anyway, perhaps looking at 27-28kW? That would be a Greenstar 28(something). Maximum hot water flow rate of 11.4 litres/min. So a 10 minute bath fill would give you 114 litres of hot water. The smallest Greenstar 25Si gives you 10.2 litres/minute or 102 litres of hot water in 10 minutes. Or roughly 15 minutes to fill your bath with 150 litres of hot water.



So by a very rough rule of thumb the smallest boiler could heat your house but not fill your standard bath tub in an acceptable time.



A thermostatic mixer should be fine, though.


TL;DR at what point does flow rate to fill a bath take precedence over heat output required for the radiators?



Cheers


Dave R


If you have one of those pointless "shower baths" then a combi is the last thing you want. The baths bulbous shape means that even a standard hot water cylinder (36" x 18") may not be sufficient.

David submitted this idea :

I'm an impatient sod, I have an open vented cylinder and (assuming hot water is ready) I can be in the bath in a few minutes. From cold, my boiler heats up a full cylinder in around 20 minutes. None of this waiting for the HW to begin to come through, or only being able to run HW or CW. I have a 9.5Kw electric shower and having tried it before, it can take forever to fill the bath and be barely warm enough by the time it is filled.

You choose. Your advantage is you know what you're getting. Personally I wouldn't put much depth of water in a bath, I grew up with annual well shortages, which made for shallow shared baths of brown water, presumably iron stained. How times change!

NT

We've got rid of the bath and only have a shower now, but when we had the bath it was used for bathing the children and for deep, hot, long relaxing baths for the adults. For the adults (and later for the children were old enough to use the shower), the bath was never used for getting clean, the shower was for that.

Under those circumstances, I'd say you want a fast bath fill for regular use, but if it is only going to be used ocassionally for relaxation, a slower fill is acceptable.

SteveW

This is correct.

When my house was built, the heating engineers calcualetd it needed 10KW of house heating. You cant even run a shower off that at any decent flow rate. But 150 liters of preheated water at 2.1 bar does very nicely!

In germany my sisters old house, insulalted to the hilt and triple glazed had a MASSIVE - I mean the size of the average toilet - sized combi to provide hot water. Id guess around 50KW+.

It is the omly combi that I've ever seen that could provide hotw water to teoo places simulatenously. It might have had a heatbank - I dont know

You can stil get peat stained water in some locations.

I've never worked out how one is supposed to get clean, that's clean off *real* dirt in a shower. How on earth do you scrub your feet or knees clean in a shower, or even for that matter scrub your hands clean. A shower is fine for rinsing oneself quickly but for actual removal of ground in dirt it's not very good.

The answer perhaps depends on how much heat you need to make all the radiators hot. I suspect you need 25kw or more to have an adequate supply of hot water. The boiler I have is rated at 20-25kw. It does not take 10 minutes to fill a bath. It would be much to hot if I did not add cold water.

<snip>

Make sure the overflow isn't blocked. It takes so long, you /will/ forget you have a bath filling.

Cheers

Chris Green presented the following explanation :

Nothing to stop you from just sitting on the bottom of the bath or shower base to scrub your feet and knees. Get wet, shower off, sit and scrub, rinse off with shower.

Which is *very* unlikely, so I reckon that the figure of a shower using 62 litres in 8 minutes is wrong.

Without doing the maths, a bath being only the size of a car fuel tank sounds wrong. If a bath is very roughly:

width 0.8 m length 1.5m (nowhere near long enough for me, at 1.8m to lie full length) depth 0.3 m (very approximately - that is the most variable dimension because it depends on preference)

and if you assume as a rough approximation that a bath was straight sides

then volume is 0.8 x 1.5 x 0.3 m^3

1 m^3 = 1000 litres

so a bath is 360 litres.

That sounds far too large - it's about 4x the figure that the document quotes.

I imagine a realistic figure, taking into account the tapered sides of a bath, is going to be somewhere in between.

Next time I have a shower, I'll time how long it takes me and measure how much water flows (into a bucket) in that time.

Isn't your logic the wrong way round? If you have a very large bath, then a standard hot water cylinder will not be enough, so you *will* need a combi (heat-on-demand) rather than a stored-water heating system.

The oil-fired combi boiler that we had at our last house could run hot water that was too hot to bear your hand under, at full flow from mains cold water pressure (ie not from a header tank), and it could keep that up indefinitely.

Yes, it took a little while for the water to run warm, but not much more than it takes for hot water from a cylinder to run warm, having displaced all the cold water in the pipe from the cylinder to the tap. Most combi boilers have a small internal tank of water which is pre-heated and kept warm, to provide initial hot water until the heat exchanger has got up to full temperature and is producing full-temperature water.

The boiler was sited outside and was about (WxDxH) 1.5 x 1 x 1 metres. I'm sure a lot of the size was due to the extra insulation needed for withstanding freezing temperatures outdoors; a wall-mounted indoor one may well have bee a lot smaller.

I've no idea what power rating it was.

I'd always thought that combi boilers had a restricted flow rate - ie that if you turned the tap on too far, the water would be cooler. But that certainly wasn't the case with our oil-fired boiler. Even with the tap full on, fed from mains pressure, the water was too hot to bear your hand under. It took as long to run a bath of hot water as if you'd filled it from the cold tap - no longer.

You should generally size for the hot water demand... Note that ive you go for particularly powerful combi boilers (>= 35kW) they will often only output their full power when heating DHW, and not CH.

80 litres is a bit feeble - there are some shallow narrow baths that will only need that, but 120 to 150 is more realistic minimum.

Note that those figures are usually quoted at a 35 degree temp rise, so in the winter with the incoming main at 5 deg that's going to be a pretty tepid bath by the time its delivered.

Go for a minimum combi size of 35kW if bath filling is something you will do often.

Modern boilers will load match and modulate when running the CH, so you don't have the same problems as one did in the past with an oversized boiler.

In a past property I fitted a 35kW combi, and it was just about tolerable for a bath fill (you can always get in before its full!), but it was very good for one shower, and ok for two showers at once. (IIRC it only delivered up to 24kW when in CH mode)

I would argue its the only point worth considering with a combi, unless its a storage type with an integral unvented cylinder.

If you have a large bath then you need a decent sized cylinder (although keep in mind the cylinder can store water at much higher than final use temperature, and if the controls are well setup the boiler can fire to start reheating long before its actually depleted).

Even a 105L cylinder or water at 60 deg, will allow delivery to a 150L bath at final mix temperature; a more respectable 220L cylinder significantly more.

formatting link

A basic shower will be say 7 to 8 lpm, so that sounds about right.

(although I can spend more than 8 mins in a shower quite easily)

A more luxurious shower could easily be 10 to 15 lpm - especially if it has a "soaker head" or body jets.

Remember that a fair bit of that volume will be taken up by the bather. Note also that the height the overflow is positioned at will "steal" a fair bit of theoretical capacity.

You forgot Archimedes surely. When you get in the water level rises so you don't actually need 360 litres.

It also depends on how hot the water is in the tank. For a bath you may use 50% hot water and 50% cold water from the mains to get the required temperature.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required