I dont know why one would think that.
Or why doing it from new is meeting current requirements but an expanded old ring isnt.
NT
I dont know why one would think that.
Or why doing it from new is meeting current requirements but an expanded old ring isnt.
NT
Thanks, that's very helpful. The 50 metre number came from:
If that number is wrong then that means we have plenty to play with and there's no sense in coming up with ad-hoc solutions.
Not sure where they got that 50m figure, but its definitely not right. From the horses mouth:
Thanks John, and indeed everyone who contributed to the thread. I've now got a way forward :)
Bill
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required