Upgrading to 300Amp electric service

My homebuilder says upgrading my electric service to 300 or even 400 Amps will result in more "efficient" use of electricity by my appliances. Can one of you experts out there please explain how this is so?

Only if you are planning to use up to 300 or 400 amps, otherwise he is full of BS, sounds like a sales pitch to get you to pay a premium for the extra amps. More important is to get a panel with as large a capacity of circuit breakers as you can, which may take more than one panel to do the job, so that there are a lot of lightly loaded circuits instead of loading each circuit to the max. This will give you more "head room" in each circuit so the ones that end up with a load are not overloaded. Also to provide a separate circuit for each large load or critical load such as a separate line for a freezer, etc.
  Quoted Text Here  

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 16:46:04 -0400, "Eric Tonks"
  Quoted Text Here  
I agree with you.
But you remind me of a long time question I've had.
When I lived in a 1930 apartment building, the fuse box in my apt. had 2 slo-blo 15 amp fuses, and in the basement the fuse that served my apt. was 1 slo-blo 20 amp fuse.
I was told this was bad, because 2 x 15 = 30 which was more than 20. I was told the sum of the fuses downstream should never be more than the upstream fuse. Any truth to this????**
I sort of figured first, that the landlord would not rewire the whole building and I needed my 30 amps, so I should keep my mouth shut. second, the building had been working this way since 1930 and there were no electrical fires, and that's still true today, 75 years after construction. and third, the 20 amp fuse in the basement would protect the 12 gauge wire from the basement to the 5th floor. That was its job. But there were sometimes I would use 14 amps through one fuse and 5 through the other, and that would be under 15, and under 20 total so what's wrong with that. Anything higher would blow one fuse or the other.
**If there is any truth to the idea that two 15 amp fuses can't feed a 20 amp fuse, why is it all right for the sum of all my circuit breakers to be greater than the main serving my house. I have cb's totally 200 or more amps now, and room in the box for in the box for 120 amps more. Maybe more. I'll never use anywhere near all of it at once, but if this is ok, why was my apartment setup not ok??
BTW, slo-blo is only 5 or 10 seconds, right? It's more than 1/2 second like non-slo-blo, but no where near 30 seconds, is all of this so?
  Quoted Text Here  

  Quoted Text Here  
Nope. The current is limited to 20A max, no matter what the downstream fuses are. Fuses are sized to the wiring they protect. Period.
  Quoted Text Here  
You weren't getting 30A, only 20.
  Quoted Text Here  
No surprise -- nothing inherently unsafe in what you've described. Silly, perhaps, but not unsafe.
  Quoted Text Here  
Nothing.
Ahh, now that's a different story. Two 15s feeding one 20 is not the same as one 20 feeding two 15s.
  Quoted Text Here  
It's just not a problem.
  Quoted Text Here  
It is ok, and that's why -- you won't ever use anywhere near all of it at once. For example, the probability is near zero that you'll ever use your air conditioner and furnace simultaneously. It's also quite unlikely that all of the lights in your house will be on at once, or that you'll simultaneously be using all of your appliances.
  Quoted Text Here  
It was ok, at least as you describe.
  Quoted Text Here  
I never timed one, but yeah, it takes a little while, but only a little.

On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 23:49:57 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
OK. I'm happy. It's been a long time but I thought one or two people said it was bad at the time, and that 2 or 3 others have said it was bad since then. Whoever did complain to me, it seemed like an absolutist rule that didn't make sense. I'm glad it's not a rule after all.
Thanks. Several more reply lines below, but this was the essence of it.
  Quoted Text Here  
Right. My mistake. I really needed my 20 amps. 4 people for a few years, and later 2 people and one room air conditioner. I also worked things out so I could go to the basement to change the fuse in the middle of the night without bothering the super. I think I replaced a blown fuse about 10 times in 10 years. Somewhere between 8 and 18. I vaguely remember a short period where I blew a whole bunch, but I can't remember why. 18 in ten years doesn't seem like too many.
  Quoted Text Here  
Compared to I guess 200 amps I have now, I really was not constrained much by having only 20. Washing machine, no dryer or course, gas stove. Plenty of lights, radios, I might have had two tv's on at once once in a while (one in the kitchen), but iirc no roommate (I had about 20) ever had even one tv. I wonder why not.
  Quoted Text Here  
I think this is typical for 100's or thousands of buldings in NY. Immigration was high all the time, but especially the 1880's to 1914, I think it was, so there were plenty of buildings nicer than tenements being built by the '30's. The war may have prevented much building in until '45, and after that there was probably more electricity provided for each apartment.
In the garbage room on our floor (where there was a chute that led to the basement, where the garbage was first burned and then later compacted, there was a sticker on the wall: "Save your cans. Defeat the Axis." They only painted this tiny room every 20 years or so -- it didn't seem to get dirty -- and when they painted in 1980, they didn't paint over this.
  Quoted Text Here  
I meant to say it the other way. Or I was looking at "feeding" in a different way. But regardless, I didn't mean anything different from before.
  Quoted Text Here  
That's what I thought.

  Quoted Text Here  
It better not be, because probably most people would be in violation of it. The sum of the ampacities of branch breakers in a main panel is _usually_ higher than the main feed breaker.
[IIRC, the breaker sum in our panel is > 3 times the size of the main breaker.]
  Quoted Text Here  
Slo-blos are _specifically_ designed to ride out the startup current surge of a motor - typically 3-5 times higher than the steady state amp rating of the motor. If that takes more than 5-10 seconds (eg: the motor is stalled), the fuse better blow or the wiring might do something real bad (eg: melt).
So, no, you don't want a slo-blow to take much longer than that.

Sanj wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
Rubbish

It only makes sense if your connected load requires it, but has nothing to do with efficiency
  Quoted Text Here  

Only in the sense that if larger service entrance conductors were installed you would have less of a voltage drop and losses from resistive heating that you would otherwise under very heavy loads. A lot depends on the length of the drop. If all the facts are known, it can be calculated with reasonable accuracy (the resistance of the SE conductors and the resulting voltage drop as a fuinction of current used).
You would have to be using most of that 300A most of the time to see a difference though. It probably would reduce the incidence of lamp dimming under heavy load conditions.
I don't think it would make any diffenence in your bill whatsoever since metering is done after the SE conductors make it to your house. Any energy lost in the SE conductors as heat (P=I*V or I^2*R) would not be metered.
  Quoted Text Here  

It depends on your needs and the size of the home. I know a couple with a 7000 SQ foot home they have two 250 amp main panels. I was told 250 is the largest main home panels available but dont know if this is true.
Frequently main entrance cable around here is alunimum, I would spend the extra for copper from the meter can to the main breaker.
sounds like a big home have you included a standby generator for power failures? thats $ well spent

  Quoted Text Here  
Why? The electricity doesn't know the difference.
  Quoted Text Here  
Why would it be better spent in a big home than in a small one?

  Quoted Text Here  
Actually Al is better for heavy gague service entrance conductors. The metal oxidizes less, it weighs less and it stands up to the elements better than Cu if the jacket is damaged (due to the thin patina of oxide). You only need slightly more metal to get the same resistivity as Cu but these things are over engineered anyway. Al also expands less than Cu which is an advantage for long overhead lines to reduce droop in the summer. Other than that, in a poll, 4 out of 5 electrons don't care what metal they are in. :)
  Quoted Text Here  
Rule of thumb, more house, more lights, plugs and loads. A smaller house (~100SF) could justify so much current but it would need a big load like a Kiln or an electrically heated pool.

  Quoted Text Here  
I most certainly is more efficient, For his Wallet

The bigger you go the more he makes.

Sanj wrote:
  Quoted Text Here  
Sounds like you've encountered another sharp cookie selling Girl Scouts.
Why not have fun and ask him to explain to you in writing why it will be more efficient.
Jeff (Who hates guys like that....)

  Quoted Text Here  
one
Just a techinical issue, I am unaware of any manufacture that makes a 300 amp service.
Get a service for the load. Bigger is not better in this case.
I will provide my address if you feel the need to give away money needlessly.

  Quoted Text Here  
He is right. While you are at it, make sure you get the extra thick paint, the more dense drywall, the bigger element light bulbs, the heavier gauge metal appliances, the dryer lumber, the triple sanded floors and cabinets with the extra thick polyurethane, quicker curing concrete and 5 dimensional shingles. All this will help make your home more energy star and lighter because after your builder removes all that money from your wallet your home will be much lighter than before since you wont be carrying all that cash around. Bubba

The quicker curing concrete isnt as strong as regular stuff:(
The advantage to a copper conductor from the meter can to breaker box is minimizing resistance losses. Sure its not much but its still wasted.
What the power company loses is their trouble as long as my service works fine...
I dont know of anyone who makes a 300 amp service

  Quoted Text Here  
Ah, no. When using aluminum, you're switching to a higher gauge wire, so the resistance will be about the same.
The issue with aluminum is poorly done/improper terminations. It's less forgiving of sloppy workmanship than copper. Properly installed, there are no issues with aluminum feeds.
Individual circuits with aluminum multiply the risk of poor workmanship, so many/most juridictions no longer permit aluminum for branch circuits. But with main feeds or subpanel feeds, they're still quite common.
  Quoted Text Here  
But 300A and 400A service drops _are_ common. So while they may not make panels that big, there's nothing to prevent you from splitting a (say) 400A drop to two 200A panels. If done to code...

snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote: ...
  Quoted Text Here  
A three hundred ampere service is a four hundred ampere enclosure with a three hundred ampere breaker or fuses installed, two 150 ampere main breaker panels installed in parallel from a single set of service entry conductors, up to six main disconnecting means supplied from a single set of service entry conductors that are sized to carry 300 amperes, and the list goes on. The size of an electric service is based on the calculated load with an allowance, if wanted, for future expansion. The resultant amperage is the figure that governs the size of the service entry conductors. The only time that the service Over Current Protective Device (OCPD) has to match that ampacity is when it consist of only one OCPD. If it is two or more OCPDs it can exceed the size of the calculated load by a large amount as long as the calculated load is within the ampacity of the service entry conductors that are installed. This is just one of the things that is easy for untrained and unqualified persons to get wrong when doing electrical installations. If the eventual connected load exceeds the ampacity of the service entry conductors the overload can cause a fault in the service entry conductors that can lead to a burn down and may kindle a structure fire. Service Entry Conductors do not have short circuit or ground fault protection. In many cases the only protection they have against overload is the conscientious work of the electrician in properly executing the service calculations. This is why some localities do not permit the use of multiple service disconnecting means that total to more than the ampacity of the service in individual residential properties.
240.6 Standard Ampere Ratings. (A) Fuses and Fixed-Trip Circuit Breakers. The standard ampere ratings for fuses and inverse time circuit breakers shall be considered 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2500, 3000, 4000, 5000, and 6000 amperes. Additional standard ampere ratings for fuses shall be 1, 3, 6, 10, and 601. The use of fuses and inverse time circuit breakers with nonstandard ampere ratings shall be permitted.