Apparently something too simple for you. The law changed but the reality behind it (the actual harm of whisky) DID NOT.
Good job of evading what you're supposed to be replying to.
Apparently something too simple for you. The law changed but the reality behind it (the actual harm of whisky) DID NOT.
Good job of evading what you're supposed to be replying to.
For a little while this was more fun than trying to explain ANYTHING to a rock.
George W wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
I use the term "liberal" as it is generaly meant in current usage. Meaning "leftist/socialist/'progressive'/Communist". I agree that many current "conservatives" are not always conservative. I myself am not 100 % "Conservative". But I DO believe that written law should mean the same as written *always*. Otherwise,it's meaningless.
I believe you lost "context" here.
Again,a loss of context.
LAW doesn't "control" anything;it provides for punishment after the fact.
"I" said nothing of the sort. IMO,that's your interpretation.
snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote in news:c2rUi.7634$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net:
People who think like this "Mark Lloyd" are what's wrong with the world.
IMO,you're arguing with a void.
That of course is completely irrelevant to any question regarding the legality, or illegality, of any particular behavior -- or whether the words "legal" and "illegal" have meaning.
I'm sorry these concepts are too difficult for you to grasp, Mark.
I reserve the right to not continue a discussion with someone who consistently replies to things I didn't say while ignoring those I did.
[snip]
Of course it's "right" to ignore reality :-)
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.