Re: RECIPE: Hamantashen (Jewish Holiday - Purim - Pastries)

Sep 10, 2026 Last reply: 20 hours ago 4 Replies

On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:05:33 -0000 (UTC) Cindy Hamilton snipped-for-privacy@invalid.com wrote:


> There is no classic reference that Haman wore a three-corned hat.
> > Tasch, means Haman's pocket pouch or pocket; thus, Hamentaschen or
> > Hamentashen. That references back to the vast treasure he offered
> > to destroy the Jews.
>
> There's no evidence Haman existed, either. People can make up
> whatever etymology they please.

You lie as easily as some breathe Hammy.



formatting link
Hāmān According To The Qur’an: A Brief Character Analysis



Haman is mentioned by name in six verses of the Qur’an.[1] From these six verses we can deduce Haman is one of the characters depicted in the confrontation between Moses and Pharaoh, indicating it is this part of the story where the context of Haman can be properly established. Other characters that form part of this narrative are Hārūn (Prophet, supporter of Moses) and Qarūn. Three other characters, al-Samiri, the unidentified servant and the servant of God, do not play a role in the confrontation though they are part of the larger Moses narrative. One of the most vividly described and oft-repeated head-to-head confrontations in the Qur’an, this story can be found dispersed throughout many sūrahs. Based primarily on the principal continuous text portions we can indeed discover the Qur’anic Haman, and reach a more useful assessment of his character than simply listing the verses containing his name.



CONFRONTATION BETWEEN MOSES AND PHARAOH



The confrontation between Moses and the Pharaoh is one of the most vividly described stories in the Qur’an, mentioned with details in fifteen sūrahs.[2] This part of the story begins when God sends Moses to Pharaoh with miraculous signs. After showing Pharaoh his miraculous signs, Pharaoh’s inner circle of leaders become fearful, with Pharaoh accusing Moses of being a learned sorcerer trying to expel him from Egypt by using magic. Consequently, the Pharaoh sets a challenge between Moses and his best magicians to see whose signs are really superior; this event is given added significance as it is to take place on the renowned ‘Day of Celebration’. When the contest takes place and Moses prevails, Pharaoh’s magicians fall prostrate and openly declare their belief in the God of Moses. Pharaoh refused to accept the result of the contest and instead threatens severe punishment to anyone who believes in Moses and his God. Frustrated by Moses’ success and the wavering of his own people, Pharaoh instructs Haman to construct for him a lofty tower so that he can survey the God of Moses, though he is convinced Moses is lying. Thus we can observe it is at this stage of the confrontation that Haman assumes a clearly defined role. Likewise, it is at this point in the story we reach the climax of Pharaoh’s haughtiness and arrogance, who after been given a physical demonstration of miraculous signs and personal reminders from Moses, thinks he is able to survey God as a God. Eventually Pharaoh tried to kill Moses and his followers but instead was drowned as a punishment from God and his body preserved as a sign for future generations.



The main characters in the story are undoubtedly Moses and Pharaoh, protagonist and antagonist, respectively. Though Haman is portrayed as a minor character whose authority and power are clearly secondary to Pharaoh’s, his importance as part of Pharaoh’s court should not be underestimated. Indirectly, Haman’s seniority as part of Pharaoh’s court is mentioned in the story when Moses was sent to Pharaoh and his chiefs with signs but they were rejected [Qur’an 7:103]. Although not mentioned by name in this verse, it is clear that Haman must be considered part of this group and he is one of Pharaoh’s leading supporters. Only snippets of information are given regarding Haman, so one cannot indulge in an all-encompassing discussion regarding his personality, character traits, etc., though what we do learn about him is not unimportant. Haman is given commands and carries them out dutifully. He is put in charge of a very important construction project, indicating he possessed seniority and skill necessary to see the task through to completion, although we are not told anything more about the construction of the tower or if it was even built. He holds a senior enough position to be mentioned along with Pharaoh repeatedly. He was also an accuser, calling Moses a sorcerer and a liar. Haman is portrayed as a highly unethical character; motivated by his hatred towards the believers, and, along with Pharaoh and Qarūn, he initiated the slaying of the sons of the believers sparing only their women. Haman’s character is unchanging; he does not acquire any new attributes and is described as a wrongdoer, arrogant and one who commits sins. Haman died perhaps around the same time as the Pharaoh as a punishment from God for his unbelief and tyranny.


Hammy _always_ lies_ and when caught she never says a word in reply nor rebuttal, just slinks off to lie again another day.

This kind of intellectual deceit and misdirection is risible and all too common among the left who must manufacture outrage to cover for their own lack of critical reasoning and dearth of verifiable data points.

What's worse is that Hammy is on a rinse, lather, repeat cycle here and so it may be useful to compile a weblog of her most obvious hoof in mouth episodes to replay for her again and again and again...

Suffice to say AI and Hammy are incompatible.

Bugger off then , Hammy dear.

You seem to operate in a weirld where mere aphorisms and turns of phrase constitute guardrails on your larger perceptions, which are as blunted as an old butter knife anyway...

Oh and:

"AI Overview

Yes, you can prove a negative statement or the non-existence of something, provided the claim is tested within a defined, bounded space or a logical system.

Examples of Negatives That Can Be Proved

Closed physical spaces: You can prove there is no milk in a specific mug by looking inside it, or that a sealed room contains no oxygen by running a chemical test.

Mathematical limits: You can prove that no integer squared equals 2 (\(\sqrt{2}\) is irrational) or that there are no three positive integers a, b, and c that satisfy \(a^n + b^n = c^n\) for any integer n > 2 (Fermat's Last Theorem).

Logical definitions: You can prove that no triangle has four sides because it violates the fundamental definition of a triangle.

Exhaustive searches: You can prove that a specific text (like the novel Moby Dick) contains the word "xyz" zero times by running a search through every single word.

Biochemical limits: You can prove that Earth's atmosphere is not made of 90% pure chlorine gas because humans are alive and breathing it, which would be impossible under those chemical conditions.'

On 9/10/2026 11:26 AM, chef boy howdy wrote:

[remainder snipped for a semblance of brevity]

What's the difference whether it's true or not? Many people enjoy their religion for the traditions of that religion as much or more than the belief system that religion preaches. If some people enjoy baking and/or eating a certain pastry it's irrelevant whether or not the tradition of baking and/or eating a specific pastry recipie is factually based. They enjoy the tradition and possibly the food(s) associated with it. We have no right to criticize anyone's traditions provided they don't intrude on our freedom to enjoy different traditions.

The knee-jerk swift dismissal as if Hammy had a f****ng clue, that's what!

That's nice and so?

Croissant time for you then?

And yet Hammy did.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required