As a former dealer service manager I will give a different viewpoint -
- - The manufacturer's recommendations are the minimum required maintenance to get the car through warranty and also calculated to give the consumer the (sometimes but not always accurate) impression that the cost of opperation will be lower.
As a dealer service manager MY job is to have the customer be very happy with both the car and the dealership. This requires a fine balancing act. I need to increase the probability that the customer's car will NOT break down and will NOT require "unscheduled repairs" - making the customer VERY HAPPY with the car while still not making the maintenance cost high enough that the owner is NOT HAPPY with the dealership. This sometimes requires servicing the vehicle a little more aggressively than the "bare minimum required" by the manufacturer.
In my experience vehicles maintained on a slightly modified schedule - some things done a little oftener, others a little less - resulted in vehicles virtually NEVER having to come in between scheduled maintenance for breakdowns or unexpected repairs. This resulted in LOWER overall maintenance costs over the long term - not even taking into account the "cost" to the customer in being inconvenienced by the breakdowns.
Like I told a prospective employer (a competitor who would have hired me as their service manager) their best salesman sells a customer ONE CAR - while the service manager sells him the next, and the next, and the next - as well as selling his friends not only their first - but consecutive cars as well. (this was when he emphatically declared "service managers don't make $40,000" when I told him that's how much I was going to cost him - - - (this was MANY years ago - - - )