On F
riday, August 2, 2013 9:02:21 PM UTC-7, Wes Groleau wrote:
albeit legal drug. Besides I'm very allergic to the smoke as are many emp loyees of my
th in the non-smokers' rights movement -- must be at least 2 decades ago. What we had to go through, between the all-powerful tobacco lobby and the f reaking politicians who were too scared or too venal to vote in the public interest!!!
. don't realize what it was like back then -- threats, insults, sometimes p hysical violence.
lers who are suffering like hell from smoke drifting into their space from another unit or from a balcony. The smokers are indignant that they can't do what they like in their own space. The victims -- perhaps with a medica l condition that could be life-threatening if they inhale smoke -- are equa lly indignant that they have to live with windows closed in all weather, ca n't go out on their porches/balconies, and even so, smoke finds its way in to their space.
people stuck in an unbearable situation in older housing.
****Where is "here"? Which state or locality?Different states approached this problem with varying ardor.
For a while, restaurants tried "smoking sections", but very few spent the m oney to provide separate ventilation. Mostly it was a band-aid that did ab solutely nothing to keep smoke away from non-smokers' the smoke didn't know it was not supposed to attack them.
Your "freedom of choice" argument that owner of restaurant can do whatever he/she wants is a fallacious one. Restaurants serve a public good. They a re regulated as to the food they serve, as to toilet facilities, as to fire alarms/exits even as to parking in some localities.
There have been many tragic cases of people burned to death because of inad equate or inoperative fire systems OR EVEN LOCKED EXITS!
Same with bad food served to YOU and YOUR family, who got sick and maybe di ed.
It took DECADES to overcome the enormous amounts of money poured into this situation by the tobacco lobby. *You should educate yourself on how viciou s and dishonest was the propaganda they put out*. And how openly they paid off national and local legi$lator$ to fight non-smokers' rights movements.
Please rethink your inaccurate comparison to restaurant access with hospita l access. (You do, in fact, have the right to refuse to enter a hospital -
- if you are conscious and weird enough to want to make that choice.)
But if you cannot enter a restaurant without suffering from tobacco smoke, where is your choice?
HB
[...]