You asked "how is a home with K&T better"? Why should a house with K&T be "better"? Is a house with Romex "better"? Is my house with rigid conduit "better"? How do you manage to ask such stupid questions?
You don't have the minimal reading ability required to read my post?
Why can't you write intelligible sentences? Do you really not know what a master electrician is?
My mother's house was "properly rewired" over 50 years ago. The electricians just re-fed the K&T. Does the NEC allow that now? (Hint: I have answered that numerous times.)
Mike Holt is well known in electrical circles. In his discussion forums why don't electricians share your paranoia about K&T? Are they stupid? Why do they just think K&T is a wiring method that just has to follow NEC rules?
Your, your? Did you graduate from high school? Did it include English classes? Why are your posts so stupid? Haven't you read I have never had K&T? You can't win on technical issues so you attack?
Have you figured out that your source doesn't agree with you? Why does your source say "properly installed and unaltered K&T wiring is not an inherent fire hazard"? Is your source wrong or are you wrong? You pointed at the "photos of hacked K&T wiring" in your source. Why weren't most of the photos identified as involving K&T wiring? Couldn't your source, which was about K&T wiring, find hacked K&T wiring? Why does your source insulate over K&T wiring? Aren't they as smart as you are?
The "Illinois report" was to a state agency about the safety of K&T wiring. Why couldn't the report find significant numbers of house with K&T wiring and insulation where the insulation caused a fire? Weren't the authors as smart as you are? Where is the data about fires in the huge number of K&T houses that have been insulated?
Why do many jurisdictions, including at least 5 whole states, allow insulating K&T wiring? Aren't they as smart as you are?