Light Bulbs are getting Expensive / New Tax

Too many people take themselves and things they see and read on the interweb too seriously. I must now get back to bottling my new and improved troll repellent.

[8~{} Uncle Monster
Reply to
Uncle Monster
Loading thread data ...

And only a month's supply of Senators ;)

Free men own guns - www(dot)geocities(dot)com/CapitolHill/5357/

Reply to
nick hull

Because some of us getting fed up with this bastards that get in power and then giving rust shaft to the people generating new taxes so they can steel more from the pot Tony

Reply to
Tony

Reply to
Tony

NO no you got that wrong croocvks own the guns crooks are permitted to carry guns but free people must hide

Reply to
Tony

Which of course shows up why gun control laws don't work.

Reply to
Kurt Ullman

The USA has 90 firearms per 100 people, the highest ratio in the world. Laws that are not enforced don't work, but that doesn't stop Congress from making more laws.

Reply to
Phisherman

Heck works well with Immigration (G&D&R). Studies show that those areas with the most Draconian personal gun laws also have the highest rates of gun-related violence. Of course, no one has yet answered my questions about the other relationship, which is that they tend to be big cities. More target-rich environments that many areas in Utah, Colorado, etc.

Reply to
Kurt Ullman

Phisherman wrote: ...

I heard somewhere just the other day (I don't recall precisely where, but do remember thinking at the time it seemed a little unusual so I'm wondering if it wasn't NPR's All Things Considered or something similar) that despite the above common assertion that other places have more -- seems like Israel was one of the other places specifically mentioned...

--

Reply to
dpb

Does Switzerland still require every able bodied man to be trained in gun use? I heard gun ownership is high there too, which would certainly explain why it is a very low-crime country. I dont know, just asking, maybe somebody from there is reading.

Reply to
RickH

I don't know all the laws in this country but it seems to me that Cities that have laws making it illegal even to own the weapon of any kind has most killing and largest crime and as I said I don't know all the laws and rules but it sure don't make any sense to me

Reply to
Tony

Correlation doesn't imply causation.

Maybe the fact that every male is militarily trained leads to both reduced crime and increased gun ownership. Maybe reduced crime is due to higher employment, population demographics, cultural bias, or something else entirely.

Chris

Reply to
Chris Friesen

That's what happens when there ought to be law types get in charge. The damned socialists have taken over England and are starting here with their traffic cameras, in the name of safety. It's all bull sh--. It's about the money.

Reply to
tsi-yu

"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in news:6XmDi.48900$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net:

The House grows according to population;seems proper. you want to cut government size,get rid of gov't programs that gov't is

*not supposed to be doing*,like Social Security,Welfare,various other social programs.THAT is where the gov't sticks its nose into people's business.

what about states like Texas and California that are big and populous enough for TWO states? Split 'em up?

What we need is TERM LIMITs,so that Congresscritters don't spend their entire working lives there. That's when they start thinking they are "elites",different and better than the rest of us. They don't have to follow the laws like the rest of us do. They lose touch with reality,too.

The job was never meant to be a lifelong career.

Reply to
Jim Yanik

Kurt Ullman wrote in news:kurtullman- snipped-for-privacy@032-478-847.area.spcsdns.net:

Compare Washington,DC's crime with the nearby Virginia cities,where guns ARE allowed.If easy access to guns were the problem,then Virginia's crime would be far higher than DC's,but it's the opposite.

Criminals prefer unarmed victims.

Reply to
Jim Yanik

You know, I don't even mind the 'safety net' of welfare. I do mind when the safety net becomes a hammock though.

I see 40% of the population that will blindly vote for anyone that will promise them free stuff, and that number is growing fast.

Left as it is I don.t see any hope for change. It's going to take a series of 9/11's or WWIII to get the USA out of this socialist spiral, which, of course, is not how I would like to see the change come about.

my .02

Reply to
kpg*

Does that mean that all the crooks that sell on ebay carry guns? There sure are a lot of them on ebay.

Reply to
none

snipped-for-privacy@noemail.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Buyer beware.

Reply to
kpg*

on 9/5/2007 1:16 PM snipped-for-privacy@noemail.com said the following:

I met a crook one time that didn't carry a gun, so I gave him one.

Reply to
willshak

Jim Yanik wrote: ...

The only constitutional rule relating to the size of the House says "The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand."

Congress regularly increased the size of the House after the census to account for growth but fixed the size of the House at 435 seats in 1911.

While theoretically could revoke/revise that law, since then all that has been done is to reapportion seats based on relative populations after the official census.

--

Reply to
dpb

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.