I could go several different directions with that comment. However, I'd rather have a nude king than NP as Speaker of the House.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
I could go several different directions with that comment. However, I'd rather have a nude king than NP as Speaker of the House.
DerbyDad03 wrote the following:
messagenews: snipped-for-privacy@a19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
The difference that the toll both used and the date, time, and direction it was used appears on a bill for the EZ pass. Going to visit your lover and use an EZ pass? Your spouse opens the bill and questions you about why you were there? Better have a good excuse ready! Your spouse does not have access to the toll cameras.
Thank you so VERY much for putting those two concepts together in one thought - Pelosi and nekid.
Now I have to go douche my brain again .....
You're welcome. >;-]
Well, things can always be worse. Nancy Pelosi could be king, nude.
There are those Democrats who are actively running AGAINST the President and even against Nancy Pelosi.
But irrespective of their positions and even whether any particular Democrat is a "Blue Dog," his or her first vote in the House of Representatives will be for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker.
That vote, in turn, influences every susbsequent committee assignment, chairmanships, bill submission, and vote or non-vote. Just today we see that the House will adjourn tomorrow without voting on a budget, a tax package, or some twenty other must-pass bills.
They can aways get clothes...
Don't forget the pipe cleaners.
And stupid c*ck sucking mormons and c*ck sucking cross posting retards will never have any brains.
The King fired this volley in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
Oh, Come ON, King... don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel.
(only... don't crosspost when you do it -- by YOUR rules)
LLoyd
Well, things can always be worse. Nancy Pelosi could be king, nude.
"BALLS!!!" said the Queen, "If I had 2, I'd be king!!"
The Jester laughed and laughed, he had 2, and he wasn't king.
That has the potential to be a disaster, on the magnatude of Y2K. Brought to you by the Democrat majority.
Which BTW was not a disaster after all. But being a stupid cross posting c*ck sucking mormon, you wouldn't know that.
No, it was. Businesses had to lay out millions to inspect, correct, and test literally billions of lines of computer code. The expense was enormous.
That planes didn't fall from the sky or all the world's gophers turn carnivorous and sneak into your bedroom during the night, was a tribute to the IT profession.
I see you're using a newsreader with a vaguely French-sounding name.
I don't like the French.
As I remember, the major concern was subtracting dates. For example, if an item was purchased in 1999, and returned to the store in 2000. Lets see..... 99 minus 00.
Were there other things that were going to fail?
I'm just making the top-posters happy.
.
Gopher control equipment, apparently
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.