Dominion Voting Machine Tabulator hacked in court.

[Skid Marks]

BREAKING: Professor and Election Expert J. Halderman Hacks into Dominion Voting Machine Tabulator in Court on Friday in Georgia in front of Judge Totenberg USING ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS

In June 2023, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia unsealed the 96-page Halderman Report – the Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had been hiding this report from the public for two years.

University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Alex Halderman and Security Researcher and Assistant Professor at Auburn University Drew Sringall collaborated on the report where they discovered many exploitable vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCast X system.

Far-left Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation of Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report until this week.

The report confirmed that votes can be altered in the Dominion voting machines.  In fact, the report revealed that the Dominion software is vulnerable and can be hacked.

Lying gaslighting treasonous Democrats caught again...and MAGA got the receipts.

[Ed P]

How do we know the machine was not modified for the demonstration?

[Bob F]

We do know that the trumpies were illegally accessing voting machines and their hard drives. Why else would they do that?

[rbowman]

That's not an argument you really want to make, is it? If it can be hacked it will be hacked.

[Ed P]

ANYTHING can be hacked. The real question is how easily. This still could have been a setup.

[micky]

Now that it's increasingly likely that rump will be the Republican nominee, we can expect an endless supply of lies from them. Even more than in the past.

[trader_4]

Presumably since it's a court trial with the defendant being the State of Georgia election officials, they would have made sure that wasn't allowed. Very little out there about this, best I could find is that the pen technique involved getting a pen behind the touchscreen display to access a hidden switch. That allowed the expert to change vote tallies. Unstated is whether there was any way where this would have been detected? Like I would presume you would have to read out of the machine the current number of votes for each of two candidates, then adjust it so that the total number of votes remained the same.

Bottom line to all this, very few people are saying that these systems can't be improved. Here in NJ you vote on a touchscreen, the machine then records your votes on a paper ballot, which comes up in front of you to review before you cast your vote. The marked paper ballot remains in the machine, those can be referenced if there is an issue. What the Trump crazies want everyone to do is to jump to the conclusion that because one expert that had unlimited access to the workings of the machine can change votes in a court room demonstration, that means that votes were actually changed like this in the 2020 election. It's like getting an ace, world class burglar, giving them unfettered access to a bank's security systems, then having them show how they could defeat the security, get into the bank and claiming that means that the bank was actually robbed. The truth is for these crazies the only legitimate, secure election possible is one where Trump wins.

[David LaRue]

trader_4 [e-mail] wrote in news: [e-mail]:

Its (the election) that can prove no votes were changed and that the totals are correct. The machine has to prove it is reliable at the start and at the end and thus for the election session.