In that case, you are probably better off finding a property that is easier to maintain, something without stuccoed ceilings, real wood finishes, and so forth.
A 'classic' home or building, one where, if restored and/or kept in it's original condition, would be worth far more than the equivalent remodeled or newer one, is probably not a good investment for rental property. The sad fact is, few people treat someone else's property as well as they treat something they're own. (Google Superdome Katrina)
Even if it were possible to completely eliminate the smoking of tobacco and other herbs, there's incense, candles, dust, cooking, and even ionizer air cleaners and fans, which can stain a wall, floor or ceiling worse than anything. While the paint stick compared to the ceiling trick sounds good, you would have a tough time proving that the difference wasn't due to normal wear and tear. Nobody expects the paint, or any surface, to be perfect and untouched by a renter, even if it's on the ceiling, for the reasons I just mentioned. In most states, if not all, I don't believe you can even deduct painting from the tenant's security deposit. Same goes with carpet cleaning or replacement. Of course, if it's only been a few weeks, and the place is a wreck, then you may be able to deduct these things, perhaps, but if it's been several months or more, forget it.
For rental property, it's best to find something where just about any damage short of an thermonuclear blast can be fixed with some patching compound and paint, and any cleaning can be done with a quick swipe of 409. Anything with fancy ceilings, wainscoting, or other pretty perks is going to be costly and heartbreaking to keep up.
As for my first response to your post, I apologize for my rudeness. I was unaware you were dealing with an older building, which would certainly be better off with non-smokers. Some folks here in CA are getting a bit extreme with the no smoking issue, and it tends to make folks like me a bit punchy.
Pagan