:DAGS on the wreck, this has been asked and answered already. Short
:version: the HF version doesn't work.
DAGS means what?
I see where you said you didn't care for the Harbor Freight one and sent
it back and had decided to get a better one:
Back in 2003:
Yes that's the one. Isn't it a pretty direct answer to your question?
Or, to get to the point, did you DAGS first or post the question first?
I hate to be net nanny, but it seems that's what's happened.
:Yes that's the one. Isn't it a pretty direct answer to your question?
:Or, to get to the point, did you DAGS first or post the question first?
:I hate to be net nanny, but it seems that's what's happened.
Oh, no problem. Now I see what you meant by DAGS. Yes, I did DAGS first
(Do a Google search). However, I didn't do it in such a way as to bring
that thread to me attention, my bad, I guess. IOW, I could have done it
more thoroughly. Anyway, I don't think I've done a ton of harm here.
Could you comment on why you were dissatisfied with the HF meter? You
didn't in the thread. Thanks.
No, it's I who must apologize for net nannying. I think everyone who's
been watching a NG for over 5 years or so begins to be annoyed by the
greater percentage of posts. Growing old and getting cranky I guess...
But to answer your question more specifically: when I first bought the
HF unit it seemed poorly constructed. Seemed more like a cheap plastic
toy. Performance was equivalent. It had several "levels" of
measurement, but they didn't measure accurately or even consistently. I
suppose it would be OK as long as you don't mind a error margin of +/-
40% moisture content.
Returned it and got some clamps.
I'd say, for Dan's application, the lack of accurate measurement
wouldn't be that big a problem if it was consistent -- he doesn't really
know what the moisture numbers in the attic should be, and is mostly
looking for a spot that's different from all the rest. But the lack of
consistency sounds like it's definitely a problem.
I suspect that there's also the problem, even if you did buy it for
something like Dan's attic, that in the future there's this temptation
to use it for something else and actually believe the numbers it puts out.
Meanwhile, what I'd suggest to Dan as a practical solution is finding
some sort of paper that changes color if it gets damp (I'm not sure
exactly what to suggest, but some marks with a water-based pen on
blotter paper ought to do fine for a start), and thumbtack bits of it up
all over the attic in likely spots, and then after a few rainy weeks go
up and look at them again and see if any got wet.
The "bmoses-nospam" address is valid; no unmunging needed.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.