Adverse Possession

[The Daring Dufas]

Does sometimes feeling like it count? O_o

TDD

[trader4]

Talk about growing up, look in the mirror. Do you plan on learning how to find out simple things that can be done by entering "adverse possession taxes" into google and hitting return? Instead of "Waaah! Wahhhh! Where's a cite? Where's a cite!"

Yeah, I can see all the fuss over providing a cite if it were something obscure, hard to find, but not when it's readily found. And then miraculously, once I provided a link, you quickly figured out how google works to find more links that said THE SAME THING, ie that I was right, while still bitching that my link wasn't good enough. So, here you are, still bitching, after making a complete ass of yourself.

[Malcom "Mal" Reynolds]

I love long unclipped posts

[Harry K]

And here you are still trying to excuse your bad manners or not providing a cite when first asked for it as is tj usenet protocol. BTW as a reminder, I am not the only one who asked for acite (and didn't get one).

When you are done whining about it, how about learning how to trim posts. I had to eliminate near a thousand blank lines in my reply.

Harry K

[krw]

You really are an idiot, Harry. Have you seen the damage you Google Groupies do to the Usenet? No, of course you haven't. You don't care.

[krw]

Google Groupies, like Harry, just love to pollute the Usenet. ...and then whine about it.

Just to please Harry, I didn't snip either.

[trader4]

I don't recall anyone else asking for a cite, only you. But if they did, just because someone else is as lazy as you and can't type "adverse possession taxes" into google, doesn't mean I have to do it for them. You could have used google in a small fraction of the time it took you to make all those posts.

For someone who was dead wrong, it's YOU who have the bad manners, bitching on, instead of just accepting that I was right all along. Now I'm wrong because I didn't click my heels and do your work for you. Go figure.

[Harry K]

You answered him with your usual "look it up yourself" instead of following usenet protocol and providing a cite.

Look at all the bandwidth you could have saved if you had just done what is required and given a cite.

And then in your vast google ability you couldn't even come up with a good cite but provided an obscure appellate court case.

But keep on whining, I quit.

Harry K

[trader4]

Really? You have a cite where I said that? See how that works?

Look at all the bandwidth that YOU could have saved just googling "adverse possession taxes". Good grief!

Imbecile. The appellate court ruling showed not only the law, but the law applied in a case where who paid the taxes determined who won and lost. You on the other hand, find a document by an unknown author on a California Dept of Transportation website to be the definitive source on AP law for the whole USA. At least you figured out how to find it with google though.

[nestork]