After you showed up with symptoms of a brain tumor---
He would consult with his keepers, err.. partners, Chainsaw, Rumdum
and Bullshitowitz, and conclude that you had really had a heart
attack. Despite extensive tests which showed you had not had a heart
attack he would insist on doing bypass surgery, despite his not being
a cardiac surgeon. When the operation went sour, he would demand that
foreign specialists bail him out, despite his having pissed on their
shoes when they'd told him his diagnosis was wrong. As you lingered in
a coma in the Recovery Room, he would deny any responsiblility for any
problems, blaming them on a doctor who had left the hospital four
years earlier. Then he would present you and your heirs with a
That's how Bubba Dubya operates.
J. Del Col
I have received expert advice on which answer is correct, but have
decided not to tell the UK parliament or public. Furthermore, I have
absolute faith that George performed the catheter ablation on my heart
earlier today, which proves he is in fact a cardiac surgeon. Don't
listen to J del col, he's not party to what me, George and God discuss,
and was probably set up by the BBC to undermine us.
I would hire the best surgeon and not worry so much about his English.
When I had my surgery, I had it done by a person who talked like
a longshoreman, but who learned how to put people back together
in tents in Vietnam under fire.
The superficiality of the liberal approach is typified by your
It reminds me of a pair of hematologists who used to work as a team
when I was a medical student. The first, who shall remain nameless,
had the best bedside manner in the world. The patients *loved* him, as
did the residents. He was articulate, had a wonderful sense of humor,
and made people feel good about themselves. Unfortunately, he wasn't
the best hematologist in the world, and occasionally had a lapse in
clinical judgement. His partner was the opposite -- a sour, arrogant,
taciturn man who you just hated to deal with. He was, however, an
excellent technical clinician. The team worked by having the first guy
come in and glad-hand the patients, while the second one made sure he
didn't screw up.
firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill Oliver) wrote in
Yeah, all liberals can be identified by their gratuitous use of analogy.
Unfortunately Georgie "I fought the Viet-Cong with paperwork in Alabama"
doesn't have many records concerning his alleged military "service", so
we must make our judgements based on other factors and not some fanciful
omniscience that enables us to rank hematologists' technical abilities.
He did claim to be a "War President" and he does in fact have excellent
leadership ability ("Bring'em on"), so I guess that makes him the dour
but excellent clinician and not Mr. Glad-bag, nice to see you. </sarcasm>
As for non-military matters, it's pretty clear that he also hasn't
accomplished anything, unless you are somebody that can be identified by
their gratiuitous use of 'liberal'.
That's OK. I'm telling you right now that your president is as dumb as a bag
of hammers. And, in case anyone comes along and says he has a speech problem
with a fancy name, but is otherwise a bright guy, forget it. There is no
such speech problem.
Heh? Bush ain't dumb. He is "stupid ass" greedy.
The following are factual statements:
1) Bush is an oil man that failed in the oil business.
2) He failed in the oil business and being an oil man, oil is
the first thing on his mind.
3) He failed to win the election. ALL of Congress let him
win (including John Kerry and the Democrats). Why ?
They all knew there was less than 10 years of oil in the
United States oil reserves, as did all of congress. He offered
to double everyone's salary if they agreed in the near future,
and he doubled everyone's salary... i.e., took the money out
of the American citizen's pockets to put in his own pockets.
Why ? The salary of the President was high enough to lead
a very good life. It is what I call, "stupid ass greedy".
He had a plan ? He spent the the first nine months of 2001
doing what? Playing golf and planning something?
He decided on September 11th, 2001 to visit a classroom.
Why ? How many times has he ever done this in his life?
Why did he need to take a day for a photo opportunity ?
He was already elected.
He is currently pumping 5 to 6 million barrels of oil out
of Iraq each and every day, since July or August of last
year. That's a lot of money. He's not dumb. He's plain
"stupid ass greedy". There's a difference between dumb
and "stupid ass greedy".
He sat in that classroom for 5 minutes waiting for something.
What was he waiting for?
Bush is far from "dumb". "Stupid ass greedy" is what I
He still hasn't identified nor caught the person that
distributed the anthrax. It's gone around that news at
times that the FBI investigated someone, but who was
arrested and charged ?
He still hasn't caught Osama bin Laden. Salem bin Laden
died on a Bush ranch though. Who killed Salem bin Laden ?
Whose plane was Salem bin Laden flying and where was
the plane launched from ? Where did it crash ? There's a
lot of unanswered questions there.
I think the fact that he doubled his own salary for being in
office confirms (1) he is "stupid ass greedy". He is NOT
He is so smart he thinks he's smart. Watch him when he
speaks. He believes he is smart. Why does he think he's
so smart ? Why ?
It goes like this... you've just pulled the most clever trick
over on a bunch of your country people... and there are
some that know as much as you do, but they are part of
the fantasy. He knows they won't talk. They know he
won't talk. Smart! Very smart! And George feels smart.
He declared himself President. Smart! Very smart! He
doubled his own salary. Smart! Very smart! He did this
at the cost of the American Taxpayer.
Smart! Very very smart!
He presented a case to Congress where he could get their
vote at any time in the future. Who in Congress disagreed
with George when George declared war. George became
the first guy in United States history to declare war on
another country. He received unprecidented support from
Congress. Smart! Very smart!
Holy cows! He's the smartest person that's ever resided
in the White House. People will call him George Washington,
or Thomas Jefferson, or at least compare him to such.
George definitely thinks he's smart. He thinks he's very
very very smart. He however puts on the dumb act and
pretends to be dumb at times. He puts on the speech act
and pretends to be slow at times.
He has put the country into a compromising situation.
But he's protecting the oil wells in Iraq. He's pumping over
5 million barrels of oil out of Iraq each and every day. That
is a lot of money. He raises the oil prices. That is a lot more
If anyone believes he's not in country of oil prices inside the
United States, well it goes like this...
He takes country of one of the greatest oil supplies in the
world, and he promises Saudi Arabia and other countries to
raise prices and make them richer. That will account for the
prices going up. He is so smart.
Dick Cheney is his business plan man. They are as tight as
a tightly threaded button.
Now... if that is just plain old luck for George Bush, then
so be it. But ask yourself what the chances are that Bush
is that lucky?
The following represents opinion:
He knows. He planned the attack on Iraq. Dick Cheney helped.
Now, more facts:
Some news agencies reported that George Bush and other
White House officials started taking Cipro on September 11th,
2001. Why ? No one knew about the anthrax at that time...
except for George Bush ?
The anthrax came from Fort Detrick, Maryland.
New Scientist reported this fact in October 2001.
George Bush and friends continued to insist upon
calling them WMD. Why? He wanted Iraqi oil. He
was a failed oil man. He needed to redeem himself.
Dick Cheney is his partner. They are as tight as a
tightly threaded button.
George Bush continued to insist that the anthrax came
from Iraq and there was anthrax in Iraq... this supported
the WMD theory...
George Bush talks like he is real smart.
To me 1+1 is equal to George Bush + Dick Cheney (a
tightly threaded button).
Now, all Republicans... Go ahead... tell me he's smart.
I agree! I agree full heartedly. He's definitely smart. He
left some holes though... whether the people of the USA
believe it or not, that is their choice. I don't want to make
anyone to believe anything. That is for you to decide. I'm
just presenting what I believe is factual evidence of
some things that just don't fit into the American Dream.
George Bush is very smart. He knows he's smart. When
he talks, he talks like he is God. Like he knows everything,
and perhaps he knows a lot more than you or I. That
may very well be true, but it doesn't matter.
All statements about whether he's smart or dumb really
mean nothing in the whole world of things. It shouldn't
ever be brought to the forefront of anyone's head...
because just thinking that you are smart is plain stupid.
I do not want to be smart. Smart means bad things. :-)
I do not want to ever think that I am smarter than the
rest of the world. It just serves no purpose and it
means I will open myself to failure.
George Bush opened himself up for failure.
Although Bush's oil investments always failed, nevertheless he was
personally always enriched. It was public investors who took the hit.
So too he lost the election but became president anyway, & again it is the
public that takes the hit with environmental degradation, backdoor draft,
fantastic debt, & taxbreaks for industries that will relocate in the third
Bush makes cat puke smell like roses, but when Kerry uses a new-speak
phrase like "winning the peace" (a variation of 1984's "war is peace"),
it's hard to think of him as anything but a lesser of two evils.
Bush is such a skank it shoudn't be necessary to lie to make him look bad.
He really is bad. So why did Kerry make that crap up about Bush cutting by
35% funding to clean up stockpiled nuclear weapons in Russia? Bush has
done so many things that range from bad to downright evil, but he didn't
do that one. Why toss in a criticism that has no basis in fact? Kerry is
in fact fairly expert in this area & couldn't possibly have just made a
mistake. He just lied, as boldfaced a lie as the many that Bush tells,
giving Kerry no high road.
Kerry's use of new-speak & his eagerness to tell whoppers as big as those
of the Bushleaguers does not make him a heartwarming choice bound to
restore a nation to a better track. Are liars & bigger liars really the
best our country has to offer for the presidency??
-paghat the ratgirl
"Of what are you afraid, my child?" inquired the kindly teacher.
"Oh, sir! The flowers, they are wild," replied the timid creature.
I can't help but ask what your position is...
What is your position?
I don't trust either one of them. They are both trying to
keep Ralph Nader out of the election. And I was a
Kerry supporter for awhile. I'm personally leaning
towards Nader but that could change...
It's definitely not going to be Bush. And I hate thinking
global conspiracy about the Congress, but that's what
it looks like to me. The motive is there, Iraqi oil. Bush
is an oil man. Cheney is an oil man. They somehow
put themselves into office even though they were not
elected by the people... it is telling me conspiracy...
and it is only in the election that Bush presents himself
as a good guy.
Just curious, because I feel so all alone in thinking
460,000 people have asked for impeachment, so I know
I'm not alone, but I don't talk with any of them. I feel like
I'm going out on a limb talking conspiracy.
No one wants to think conspiracy... it's just one of those
things no one dares talking about, so the best I can do is
present the evidence that indicates conspiracy and leave
it at that. :-(
Is it wrong to see it all as a conspiracy ?
They're coming to take me away... haha!
They're coming to take me away...
Haha! Heehee! Hoho!
To the funny farm!
Where life is beautiful!
It's just all so wrong.
Poke around www.nti.org for more info on the questions you asked. Although
the subject haunts me (as it should EVERYONE), I haven't read extensively
enough to respond to your questions. But, my surface understanding is that
the rounding up of stray nuclear materials has been on the backburner for no
good reason, at least based on what we hear from Bush. I suspect the reason
is that Bush would be able to discuss the issue publicly without botching
the names of former Soviet republics.
Yeah, sure liberals live in their own little world. We get all our
information from Pat Robberson, Rush Limbo and Ann Cutter. When we see
state sponsored propaganda masquerading as a recruitment video, we
believe it. Join the Airforce and become a glorified gas station
attendent. Yeah, daddy I'm going ship off and be a hero. It's
important. Freedom. Kill people. Hero. Blah blah.
You claim to have some idea of what is going on in the rest of the
world, but I doubt you even know what's really going on in your own
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go tell the servant to white wash the
picket fence and I am already late for my tennis doubles with Biff and
Buffy and then off to buy a gift for my broker. I really do need to
find a new chauffeur ... I mean 'driver' ... my faux pas. Oh dear me,
I've done it again. I must have had too much _chardonay_ last night.
Oh, and did my boys ship the Statue of Liberty back yet? Yes, because
this is the little liberal world that I live in.
I have a friend named Google.
Here is a list of Botanic Gardens in Israel.
Here is a link to a site that can help you search for Herbaria in a
country of your choice. Most Middle Eastern countries appear to have
several Botanic Gardens or Herbaria.
Go to google and enter Botanical Gardens +Middle East. Also try gardens
+Middle East for some interesting history sites.
Doing precedent research on existing botanical gardens in the Middle
East. Can anyone point me to a resource or provide names of any
notable examples in this climate? Does anyone know of any with
architectural facilities such as conservatories.
Any and all help will be much appreciated.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.