Bought a house that's stuck somewhere in the late 80s. Worn carpet in the lounge, a popcorn ceiling, wood panelling everywhere, the works. My plan was to live with it for a year and then fix things one room at a time as the budget allows, starting with the worst spaces. My brother-in-law reckons that's backwards. His take is that you should do all the dusty messy jobs first, ceilings and floors and ripping out old trim, while the house is basicly empty of furniture anyway. Then you decorate room by room at your leisure. Makes sense in theory but the upfront cost scares me.
For anyone who's done a full before and after on an older place, which way did you go? Doing it all at once means living in chaos for months, but doing it bit by bit means every project kicks dust around a room you just finished. Curious what actually worked for people, and wether you regretted your choice either way.