Re: Sprinklers

> Did anyone else notice that whatever the group is that controls the

> > "model" building code is voting on a series of new proposals. I guess > > the ones re high-rises have been withdrawn but there is still one on > > the table to require sprinklers in ALL new residential units, > > including single family homes. Ugh. Seems like a bit of overkill. > > Besides, what would one then do with a rural home that's on a well. > > Definitely overkill. It's cheaper to buy fire insurance. > In our wee home we have 2 smoke detectors and a > firehose, (really a garden hose permanently connected > inside the house with a fast acting check valve and a > trigger controlled nozzle). > Every once in awhile a house explodes because of > a gas leak, how does a sprinkler perform then? > The moral of the story, use prevention otherwise > known as don't do something stupid, but be ready. > Ken

Rural homes need fire suppression far worse than urban homes, since volunteer fire departments are rated only ISO 5/9, with the 9 for houses not near urban water supplies. Insurance companies these days are starting to ask that expensive McMansion built in rural areas have sprinkers.

Reply to
George Conklin
Loading thread data ...

yup............time to add a pond to the project!

Reply to
<gary

Actually I based my comment on an actual incident from Missouri I heard about from a fire station there while visiting. The company DID want sprinklers.

Reply to
George Conklin

Ummmm, around here we have that. They put a pipe into the pond and run it underground to up near the road. Then fire companies have better access to water (especially in winter) to fill their tankers.

Reply to
George Conklin

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.