snip
Nowhere have I said that GW is caused solely (or even mainly) by CO2 but CO2 is a greenhouse gas and thus has some warming effect. A fact acknowledged even by the charlatan who claims water vapour is responsible for 95.000% of the greenhouse effect.
It doesn't matter a damn where you put the base line. Either a selected timespan is warmer than the preceding period or it is not. There is too much natural variability to be positive using just a handful of years but trends over a decade or more are certainly indicative of either warming or cooling. That is true irrespective of the cause.
Come on now, just answer the question.
I am prepared to look at evidence put forward by anyone, even you. The trouble with your evidence is that there isn't any. If there was you would quickly post the links and crow at my discomfort at not being able to refute it. But even there you would be wrong. I am always happy to accept credible evidence.
You are really Dribble and I claim my £5.