Pillock.
Pillock.
Pillock.
Because I fail to see the point in the pedantic pathetic distinction.
It really couldn't be much more pointless.
You surprise me. Normally you get at me for misusing words.
Lack of logical reply noted.
Aww, can't you handle original thought? Book says to do this, so I do it.
The only laws are the laws of physics, you can't break those. Everything else is rules, which are just the opinion of those in power. Be a slave if you like....
When I was your age I owned my house, no mortgage. I had a live in girlfriend, she had big t*ts. I also had hot running water. Please tell us what have you have got.
I find it difficult to decide which to use much of the time. Not because I don't know the difference as you have posted, but because a goodly proportion of the time I am quoting or referring to a USA usage. Writing "licence" feels unnecessarily pedantic but writing "license" feels wrong.
Correction: What you have.
Why should I pay for what the bank can pay for? And I have my choice of women, you are stuck with one. And I've already told you I have all the hot water I need.
Answer my question.
I answered it completely.
En el artículo , pamela escribió:
Amen to that.
Where's my burning torch and pitchfork?
Bête noir du jour is "would of". Grr.
That's even worse than "off of".
You have both been to Hertfordshire?
Is that where urricanes ardly appen?
En el artículo , Tim Lamb escribió:
It's the (mis-)spelling I object to, not the pronunciation.
In message , Chris Hogg writes
I was once accused by a Liverpudlian of being a Cockney! Lots of East End folk housed here post war.
>
Those two statements are exactly the same in different words, children.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.