I'm quite familiar with crimping cables end to end, but have an application where I would like to create a branch - which would involve joining *three* cables together rather than two.
Is there an accepted way of doing this - maybe with two wires (twisted together or not?) in one side of the crimp and one (perhaps doubled back?) in the other side?
Or maybe you can get Y-shaped crimps? [If so I've never seen one].
I have crimped 3 cables by pushing two cables in to one end and then putting the third cable into the other end with a short piece of wire to bulk out the connector. Doubling the cable over usually means the cable will not fit into the crimp.
If the cables you wish to join are not two big then put all three into a closed end terminal and crimp them up.
Or, as TMH has pointed out, Wago connectors. I am using the HelaCon Plus connectors at the moment which are similar to Wago and they are just superb.
You could do that. You would need to do a "tug test" to ensure that the crimp was working, but in the main, if the crimp is reasonably "full" before you crimp it, you should be OK every time.
Twisting together is not necessary other than to ensure that you don't have stray strands.
Scotchlok possibly with heatshrink,
formatting link
solder with heatshrink,
or piggyback crimp possibly with heatshrink.
formatting link
can also get y-shaped heatshrink boots, but they cost an absolute fortune:
Dedicated crimps for 2-wires into 1 terminal do exist - but require a different ratchet tool. They are used when you want to (say) daisychain earthing connections into the same ring terminal.
Check the website brand "SWA", I think they carry the crimps & tools.
For cost reasons it is probably cheaper to use one of the alternative solutions, ie, TLC Direct.
Don't need to twist. If you you are, say, crimping 3 1mm² cables, you'll probably need a 2.5mm² crimp. For the end which only has one 1mm² conductor, fold the conductor over to double up the tickness for better crimping. I do the same if I'm joining a 2.5mm² to a 1mm² with crimps.
You can get blind end crimps where you put several conductors all in the same end.
That would work - except that it's going to end up in an inaccessible location inside a stud partition[1], so is not really recommended.
[1] I have a 1.0 or 1.5mm T&E cable which goes to a wall light. I want to do away with the existing light[2], and replace it with two lights in different positions by connecting two cables to this single cable - and then sealing up the existing hole.
[2] The existing light - which is totally unsuitable for *any* bathroom zone, is on a wall at the side of a bath, and is low enough to be in Zone 1! Although against all the current regs(!) this has not been too much of a hazard in the past, but will shortly become one when my newly-installed over-bath shower becomes operational! I propose to install two Zone 2 lamps - one higher up and the other further along, so that neither is in Zone 1 - but need to extend the wiring to make this possible.
Is that going to be OK from a cable-zoning point of view? Ie the corners/above accessories/etc rules.
I must admit that some years ago, before I knew of these requirements, I similarly did away with a wall light and filled the hole, leaving a non-compliant live wire buried inside a smooth wall.
Thanks for the link. Which of the connectors on that page did you have in mind?
I'm a bit confused by the descriptions because each connector is variously described as e.g. "3 pole" or "3 conductor" - and they don't mean the same thing in my book.[1] Clarification, anyone?
[1] I would assume 3 pole to mean 3 separate connections for e.g. L, N & E - whereas 3 conductor would mean 3 wires all joined together. Which do TLC mean?
Combining them in an inaccessible location isn't a good idea. Why not extend one to one of the new locations with crimps, and then a new cable to the other location. Anyone following on in 20 years time would appreciate not having two cables appearing from one source.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.