Build a new PC (def DIY)

If it's in the SAN array, you have no choice - I suspect HDS will not be impressed if I cram a load of non HDS disks in the array :-)

We haven't got any - we just get a quote occasionally for a laugh and to remind ourselves why we haven't got any :-)

Might stick some closer to the blade servers though for VDI - but again, can't go generic for support reasons.

Darren

Reply to
D.M.Chapman
Loading thread data ...

Is it rented or something?

You need a better support company.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

No, they aren't. We own them

Right... you've a lot of experience with enterprise kit have you? Better than the manufacturer of the kit?

Darren

Reply to
D.M.Chapman

I've used several companies, and I prefer the ones that don't insist on their own parts.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

One SSD or one HDD - either would be a single point of failure.

Do you like what you see in it?

How do you do RAID with only one drive?

Personally I partition my drives to allocate logical volumes to particular tasks (system, scratch, data, apps, games etc). They can be shifted between physical drives as needs dictate.

I appreciate that some folks can't hack the concept of a hard drive partition that is not called c: but its not universal.

Reply to
John Rumm

If they're anything like Sun or EMC they will load custom firmware onto hard disks and/or make the controller reject anything that looks "wrong".

eg EMC Clariion we have uses bog standard Seagate enterprise grade disks, cost about £80-90 (or did last month!) - except they are reformatted with a wierd sector layout and the firmware is buggerated. Cost of disk the machine will actually accept - £800 ish.

Sun pulled a similar stunt, except some people did work out how to take the base disk of the same original manufacturer part number and load Sun firmware, making it a "genuine" Sun disk.

Reply to
Tim Watts

"Lieutenant Scott" is a troll, probably the same one as "Peter Hucker". Please ignore him.

Reply to
Huge

Degnerate case of RAID-0? ;->

Reply to
Tim Watts

They'll be the same people who don't realise that there are other kinds of computer than a PC running Windows?

Reply to
Huge

I was querying whether SSDs ever fail. One of the points of them is reliability

- no moving parts you see.

I'm not telling you what's on it :-P

I meant ONE "drive". I have 2 physical HDDs, which according to the OS are one drive. No messing about working out what to put on which drive.

Too complicated, see above.

Actually mine is called Mirror.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

You sound like you're making a variation on a recent mistake Dennis was making. This is not good.

You need to get a clue about corporate IT.

Reply to
Clive George

Indeed, they are good, but not perfect. Electronics can fail...

One "volume" or "logical drive" would perhaps be a better term then.

It works well for me.

One of my NAS boxen is called Flubber - SWMBO said you can't call it that, but could not actually come up with a good reason why not ;-)

Reply to
John Rumm

On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:08:06 -0000, Tim Watts wro= te:

Buggerated - good term that, must remember it.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

You're the troll. Why do trolls always call everyone else a troll?

And why are you reading my posts if you've killfiled me, is your "newsreader" broken?

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

It's a broken RAID-0. As often happens with Caviar Blacks.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

I am not familiar with Dennis or his mistakes.

I tend to get annoyed with a lot of people in corporate IT. They don't bend the rules enough.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

Aren't the chances of failing several orders of magnitude less?

It's a newsgroup post, not a research paper, I couldn't be bothered being precise:-P

Life is too short.

Because flubber is nowhere near like the texture of hard disk platters.

Reply to
Lieutenant Scott

Yeah - when an hour of downtime can cost the company a hundred thousand quid, it tends to encourage caution.

Reply to
Clive George

So that's a no then. Thought so.

Cheers,

Darren

Reply to
D.M.Chapman

To be fair, there were other reasons behind this.

The extra cost included unlimited maint at what ever level the machine was covered at. So you had a small machine and paid a grand a year (say) and then stuck 50 disks on it - no extra charge on the main as it was covered upfront in the price.

Also, Sun fixed the sizes of the disks - if you had a failure they would ensure the replacement was identical size meaning you could just replace without hassle. Identical size, layout, cyl count etc etc.

Of course, now it's all oracle it just the same, except they screw you over on the purchase price, and then still charge for maint on it :-(

Darren

Reply to
D.M.Chapman

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.