TAMPA, Fla. — An autopsy report shows that cocaine use contributed to
the heart disease that suddenly killed TV pitchman Billy Mays in June,
officials announced Friday.
If he had the surgery he might have died on the operating table. Pain
can cause people to use drugs to try and cope. You ought to know by
now that anyone is capable of using drugs, for any number of reasons,
even high profile celebrities.
Something to look forward to, with cocaine restricting arteries, think
how many low life criminals and street people could fall over dead at
If the only reason they are criminals is because they use illicit drugs, then
why do they deserve to die in your opinion?
And the "street people", you want them all dead too?
Drug & alcohol abuse is a medical DISEASE, not a sign of low morality.
Everyone, and I mean -everyone- of you reading this knows someone personally
affected by chemical dependence. I guess according to your theory, they
should all just die because that would make YOU feel better?
That's why we (in the USA) have the highest percentage of our populace in
prison. Idiots like you who think chemical dependence is a crime, rather than
a very serious medical problem.
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 20:00:11 +0000 (UTC), G. Morgan
I disagree. It is medical PROBLEM after they are hooked but not a
What? Do you think they just wake up one morning thinking, "Dang, I
need some coke." Other than prescibed medicine, they at some time made
a decision to try drugs. And became hooked.
I do agree that whatever you want to snort or ingest should be your
business and no one else's. The penalty for supplying drugs to anyone
under 21 should be death.
It's not open for debate, the doctors and some government agencies already
subscribe to the idea. That's why in more progressive localities they have
"drug court", and various other prevention and treatment programs. Only a
small percentage of druggies/alkies resort to crime to get their "fix".
Google "American Society of Addiction Medicine" and read some of the research.
I think life is a 49/51 deal. Any person is where they want to be, doing
exactly what they want to be doing with exactly who they want to be with.
Whenever the desire gets stronger one way or the other, the person goes that
way. If they don't like where they are, they leave. If they don't like who
they're with, they leave. If they don't like what they're doing, they quit.
It's all just a choice. You do what you want to do.
At all times.
Those some progress communities probably also believe that the actions a
person performs is out of their control and that we should just chalk
it up to something out of their control such as a disease. That means
they aren't responsible for their actions. However they have to make a
conscious choice to go to someone on the street and buy more drugs or
alcohol or whatever. They made the choice. They could have said no. The
reward for using the substance was too great for them to do so though.
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:36:41 -0500, email@example.com wrote:
Just to make a point. It cost millions to execute a man. The OK City
bomber was cheaper. He appealed and was dispatched. First federal case
in many years. Feds has a perfect place and honored his wishes.
Death Row guys can sit for years, maybe 17-25?
I remember this case. We walked the yard, keeping disruption to a
minimum, not even near death row.
John Arthur Spenkelink (March 29, 1949 in Le Mars, Iowa – May 25, 1979
in Starke, Florida) was the first person executed in Florida and the
second nationwide since the reintroduction of the death penalty in the
United States in 1976.
Kurt Ullman wrote:
<SNIP some repeated stuff to edit for space>
I propose that USA overtly totally bans capital punishment, effective
including and onward from the day after whenever (if) "Mumia Abu Jamal"
I find "death penalty opponents" to be disserving themselves by making
any effort so much as .001% specific towards that specific perp,
in light of how easily the "evidence" in favor of this perp presented
somewhere or another has a high rate of being negated by scrutiny via
One reason I oppose the "death penalty" is that there are fates worse
than death. One severe punishment that I propose to be worse than
execution and to be legal in USA is to be life imprisonment with
"solitary confinement", along with prison cell climate control and air
odor along with prisoner's food/beverage flavor testing via Supreme Court
the USA constitutional limits on cruel/unusual punishment.
I thought that a penintentiary (an earlier idea for "penalty
imprisonment of criminals *My Words*) was originally imprisoning
criminals into solitary confinement cells, where their prospective main
contact with the outside world by physical means was proposed to be
from reading the "holy books" of a small number of more-notable
religious faiths achieving larger annual distribution of free copies
of their "holy books".
- Don Klipstein ( firstname.lastname@example.org)
I don't try to carry on an involved conversation and I won't
try to argue with someone over the phone while driving. I'm
quite able to answer the phone, say I'm driving right now,
I'll call you later or I'll be there in 10 minutes, goodbye.
In truth, my cellphone is usually turned off and my pager is
the point of contact. I rarely take my eyes off the road while
IMO it's not the eyes on the road with cells, it's the mind.
In early cell phone years I had one for a year. As soon as I talked to
anyone I found myself not correcteing to the center of the lane as I
normally would. I found my speed was not as constant as it normally
would be. Other things as well and my eyes were on the road in a normal
manner. There was no display/screen on those except for the number
dialed. It was WHILE talking that was the issue. And the thing is,
surprising to me, it's totally different than talking to someone who
sitting in the vehicle. I don't know why.
I suppose it depends on how your mind works and whether
or not you can multi-task. The same sort of problems
happen when some drivers tune the radio or adjust the
heat or air conditioning and worst of all, scream at
a carload of kids. The most dangerous to me have been
two women in a car yacking away. It's not just cellphones,
it's any inattentive or distracted driving.
The cellphone thing is well proven to be a big distraction. As for safety,
it does depend on circumstances, traffic, etc. Cruising on the interstate
with no other cars visible on a sunny day is not so bad, but in heavy fast
traffic, it can bite you.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.