The problem is they start adding penalties as soon as it is due and
you can be in a lot of (financial) trouble before they finally get
around to coming after you.
The toll by plate already adds a $4-5 "administrative fee" just
because you did not buy a transponder and there are no toll booths to
pay as you go. That quarter it cost to go over the bridge suddenly
becomes five bucks. If you don't pay right away that number continues
to climb. You get billed for every time that process server knocks on
your door. If it gets to the (failure to appear) "warrant" phase, it
can easily be more than $200 plus whatever the court fees are and you
might end up in cuffs with your car impounded adding another $100+
Civil law is fairly uniform in that regard. The speed cameras and red
light cameras are just like the toll by plate. It is a private
contractor but they are working with the force of the state behind
them. In any case, ignoring the bill can get expensive in a hurry. It
is all about the money and more money is the penalty until you get to
the failure to appear warrant stage. Then you have insulted a judge
and that never works out well.
On 9/19/2016 2:35 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> AL wrote:
Apparently not from what you say your state does.
Here's how the game is played in my state:
So far all the people I know who have done this have succeeded including
a cop who got the ticket off duty in his personal car.
We went another way and these photo ticket machines are banned in most
of the state.
I suppose if you want to live your life dodging a process server it
might be fine, assuming you are not in Scottdale (which pretty much
says it is not state law)
On 9/19/2016 4:57 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
You don't have to dodge the process server for life, only 120 days.
From the link: "if you manage to dodge the server, the ticket will
disappear from the system 120 days after it went in."
Scottsdale still has to get you in 120 days. And according to the link
2/3 of the ticket dodgers still weren't served (and thus beat it).
Speed laws can be either state, county, or city. But it makes no
difference which speed law was cited on your radar ticket since the 120
day service rule is a state law and thus must be followed by all AZ
But the article said Scottsdale is getting a judge allowing simply
tacking it on the door if they demonstrate that 3 services were not
successful. I really don't care because I think camera tickets are
questionable at best and they have been largely abandoned here.
The toll by plate is a growing industry tho. The thought was toll
roads were a way to get tourists to pay their way and they seem to be
everywhere in the "blue" areas. I don't have that many toll facilities
here and not nearly enough to justify a transponder but when I am up
in the Tampa Bay area visiting I get slammed.
On 9/19/2016 8:29 PM, email@example.com wrote:
I think that was to scare the public into paying. Because 5 trips (3
attempts, once to court, once more to tack on the door) isn't really a
very efficient way to collect on one ticket. But publicize that and many
who thought about cheating may decide not to.
Cameras were gone here for years. They went away because of a legal
problem. The legislature finally fixed it so they are now making a
comeback. IMO they can be effective if used where actually needed and
not just for revenue generator. People definitely get halos when they
know there's a camera about.
We fleece our tourists with high hotel and rental car taxes. But then CA
does the same thing to me when I vacation there. (There are so many of
us over there that they have a name for us...Zonies.)
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:29:37 -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Perhaps it is time to look into it again. I pay a service fee of $1 a
month for the transponder. It saves a lot of time and some money even
though I don't use toll roads often. Cheaper than paying the service
fee for the "mail a bill" method some states use.
It would still be a loser for me. I only go to Tampa 2 or 3 times a
year. I don't pay that many tolls. With all the construction on
Veterans the locals tell me taking the surface road is faster anyway.
Ed - are you paying the fee for MA passes?
I used to have them (my kids went to college in Boston) but I traded
them in for NY EZ-Pass which are free for all time and work in all
states including MA. The charge/payment mechanism is the same.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
On 9/20/2016 10:40 PM, email@example.com wrote:
Back in 2001 I was traveling to NJ every week going through 14
tollbooths every week on the GS parkway. About the second or third trip
I got the EZ Pass in NJ. It was free for a fre years and then they
tacked on the $1 a a month service. At the time MA had Fast Lane but
later it was incorporated into EZPass.
The traffic schools and such are good for several things. It gives
money to the state, employees people, and maybe makes you think about
the traffic laws. It is just another way of punishment for those that
break the laws. For every law there has to be some form of punishment,
or the law is not effective.
Is that why the feds told me I would NOT be receiving any of the
$.36/hr back pay I was cheated out of by my temp employer (about $800,
total) cuz the Federal Labor Relations Board (their office in San
Francisco) told me, and I quote:
"Yes, we've found your company to be in violation of two separate
federal labor laws, but we consider such violations as mere
"administrative infractions" and their is NO penalty."
Two yrs later, the San Francisco office of the Federal Labor Relations
Board, the agency to which I originally complained, no longer even
existed, and I didn't get a cent of the $$ owed me. I tried to inform
others of this scam --who's gonna pay if there's no penalty?-- and I
was told, over and over, "I don't wanna hear it", "Want me to lose my
This over 35 yrs ago. You'd be stunned if you really knew the number
of regulatory laws that are jes window dressing.
When I was in Maryland, traffic school was an administrative process,
not a legal punishment. I refused to go and all that happened was a
notation was made on my "permanent record".
I suppose that once this became apparent, the states used the carrot
of lifting your points to make up for the lack of the stick.
I know in the "conference" I was at (30-40 people in a big room) they
were not happy when I questioned them about the wording of the
"recommendation" that I go to the school and what will happen if I
I was sent home quickly after that and I assume the cajoling started
Back in the "double nickel" days I was playing the computer game
(juggling tickets, points and court dates) pretty hard because I was
well known to the police. Once that unconstitutional abuse of federal
power was repealed, I went back to "safe driver" status.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.