Technology has made a lot of progress. For example, special effects in movies now look real, whereas those in films made in the 60s look obviously faked.
But how do architecture's special effects compare?
Suppose someone has a large interior space but he wants to make it look like being out in the open at night. Do you think this could now be done well enough so that it was indistinguishable from reality?
Kevin (For email double the number)
Suppose you served a cabal of globalists wanting to control a huge population and its resources. What better means to achieve your goal than to conduct a false flag operation, televise it, blame somebody else and use the events you created to look like something that actually wasn't to instill fear and anger into the population allowing it to be manipulated at will. Just like the domestic enemies of our nation did on 9-11.
But no, even though HAARP is said to be capable of such uses, I don't think the ability to create a "holodeck" experience can be accomplished in real space yet. On a screen in the movies or sitting in front of a computer monitor yes, but in real space not quite yet. Doing so requires an enormous amount of directed energy.
But manipulating real space and real activities to appear as if they were something they were nit? False flag operations are as old as mankind's presence vying for power and control of others.
Technology has made a lot of progress. For example, special effects in
"Kevin Cooke" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@giganews.com:
Not all, by any means, and esp. not when you know what to look for...
Difference between what passes by the mass market, and what is *truely* well-done.
Could be? Sure. Would be? To what level? They'd do just enough to be able to pass it off to the average viewer.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.