Re: Restoring #8, part 1 (w/pics)

Mar 17, 2005 2 Replies


Hello everyone,


>
> I had been looking for an old Stanley #8 for a couple of years but I could
> not find one I could afford, or if I could aford it, it was a total piece of
> scrap. I was cruising Ebay last week and I saw one here in Canada for sale,
> it looked pretty tough, but it was all there. For $118 CDN (to my door) I
> had a real Stanley # 8, type 11 (1910-1918). In the photos, it does look > bad,

Not at all. A little surface rust, and the iron is almost history; but otherwise it looks good. Check the front of the mouth for wear. I have a T11 #5-1/2C whose iron was worn shorter than your #8's. The front of the mouth had become slightly concave from use. Not necessarily a problem in a jack but maybe troublesome in a jointer.


but it is all there, just needs a little, *ahem*, work. The blade is a
> total write off, but I already picked up a new #8 Hock for under $20.

Double gloatin' are ye?


Cheers, Mike

There is a large pit just back of the knob, but way before the throat. I have not checked for flatness yet, but I will lap it anyway. This will be a good user jointer...

I was thinking about getting a new Hock chipbreaker, but this one looks in better shape than I thought it would be.

David.

I usually take some #400 sandpaper to them and see whats underneath! Usually it just is a matter of simple cleaning and lapping

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required