Good combination square

I've read past discussions in this group, but the threads seemed to boil down to the Starrett or you're making parallelograms.

I'm hoping for an alternative that's priced in the same universe as reality. Not sure exactly what price that is...

But for example the Woodcraft-branded combo square with 3 heads (square, center-finder, protractor) is about $70

formatting link
That seems almost reasonable if it's good'n square, easy to read and use. They've got a much less substantial-looking no-name one for $25 with all three heads
formatting link
on the Woodcraft or suggestions for another brand?

Thanks, Michael

Reply to
Michael Press
Loading thread data ...

With Starrett, you know it is accurate. With other brands you have to ask. Go to the store and ask the salesman if you can check the accuracy of their square against the Starrett.

You also have to consider the use. Machine setup or a machinist needs very high accuracy. Building a shed or picnic table need much less. Most woodwork falls between the two.

Reply to
Edwin Pawlowski

Forget the 3 heads. I can count on one hand the number of times I've used the protractor or center finding head in woodworking If you have a lathe, you can use a plastic center finder that'll be plenty accurate.

Get a 12" Starrett, Mitutoyo, or Brown & Sharpe combination square. You can get the Starrett or Mitutoyo for about $65, the B&S will cost more. For angles other than 90 and 45, use architect's drawing tools, which are surprisingly accurate for the price. A 30/60 triangle and a decent protractor can be had for about $15, total, at any office superstore.

I find a 6" Starrett to be the best day to day, but when you need the

12", you'll need it. If I could only have one it would be a 12". 6 and 4 inch squares make great marking gauges as well!

Barry

Reply to
B a r r y

Michael Press

I wouldn't hesitate for a minute to buy the Woodcraft square "if" it's square because a square square is square no matter who made it.

As for others, look for anything with a heavy head and an engraved blade. Again, a square square is square no matter who made it.

For additional alternatives search site like MSC (industrial supplies and tools).

formatting link

Or, get up early for the next eleventy billion Saturdays and hit the garage/rummage sales.

UA100

Reply to
Unisaw A100

There are other caveats to the Starrett besides accuracy. It works smooth in the handle. It never binds. The graduations on the blade are distinct and very easy to read. SWMBO gave me mine for Christmas. This year, she gave me the Veritas shoulder plane. :-)

Reply to
Lowell Holmes

I have an old Stanley that is square.

Reply to
KYHighlander

FWW published a review of combination squares within the last year or so, I think.

I just bought myself the Starrett 6" combination for Christmas and I highly recommend it. The difference compared to a cheap square is considerable. And there's something about the basic quality of the tool; you can "feel" it in the heft in hand and the way it feels in use.

Check out prices at The Japan Woodworker

formatting link
they're the best I've seen.

Disclaimer: Not affiliated. Claimer: Satisfied repeat customer.

-JBB

Reply to
J.B. Bobbitt

The reality is that the Starrett is a square that stays square, and will be so

30 years from now. Plus the ruler is accurate.

You can get a cheaper one, but don't blame anyone but yourself when the project you make out of the expensive wood becomes tgrach because you saved a few bucks.

Look, save some dough, get a Record plane and tune it up instead of a Lie Nielsen; it will be 80-90 per cent of what you want. Get a contractor's saw, and go slowly, instead of zipping through 8/4 maple; learn how to sharpen a hand saw and get a century old Disston. But there are some things you don't compromise with. Honest, this is a high ticket item you wlll never regret.

BTW, just to let you know, Starrett trues up theri equipment with lasers, strobes, ultra everything. Everyone else trues up their equipment by holdiing it next to a Starrett.

Reply to
DarylRos

Unless it is a Mititoyo, Brown and Sharp, Moore and Wright, ect. If you look outside Home Depot, there are a number of good ones available.

Reply to
CW

I sometimes wonder if you are posting in anagrams.

cf "Mitutoyo", "Browne", "etc.".

Thomas J. Watson-Cabinetmaker (ret) Real Email is: tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet Website:

formatting link

Reply to
Tom Watson

Yep, that's a good price all right. Someone had a sale on them for $61 recently, down from $72 or whatever, but this at $59 and change is nice. I agree that I'd rather spend the $$ on a nice tool that I can take pride in and will trust. One question though - can you use this

12" rule as a 12" straightedge?

JP

Reply to
Jay Pique

Funny, swmbo said the same thing once.

Seriously, these Starrett posts always give me a sick feeling in my stomach. My FIL's neighbor (whom we hang with quite often) retired from toolmaking (the now defunct Zeulske for you Milw boys), and sold his Starret for five bucks. "What, you were interested in that old thing?"

Joe

Reply to
Joe Tylicki

I don't think "caveats" was the word you wanted; probably more like "advantages." But I was thinking along the same line as you. Another advantage: the nut that you tighten to lock the blade is captive so it doesn't fall out.

And the blade...omigod, what a pleasure just to look at that thing and be able to read all the markings. That's a huge feature for these old eyes.

It definitely has a good feel to it. Sometimes I like to pick it up and just slide the blade back and forth because it feels so nice.

Oh, and it's square.

The Starrett website

formatting link
(click on "Precision Tools and Gauges", then "Squares", then "Combination Squares with square head - Series Nos. 11H, 33H") has all of the possible permutations of their squares listed. It takes a little while to figure out, but you can get the head in either forged hardened steel or cast iron. You can get blades either chromed (satin) or not. You can get 4", 6", 12", 18", or 24" blades (the 4 and 6" are not interchangable with the others as the head is smaller). You can get the markings in fractions or decimal or metric. There're probably one or two I missed.

The most common seems to be a 12" cast head, satin chrome blade, graduated in fractions. It's designator is C11H-12-4R.

Another good site to look at them is the Museum of Woodworking:

formatting link
a visit; the square is definitely worth buying. Don't bother with the extra heads.

- - LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

formatting link

Reply to
LRod

McFeely's had a sale on them for a couple of months about a year ago. I got mine there for $49. As I recall, in a fit of buyer's remorse just after I hit the "Buy" button, I looked around the internet and found that that price wasn't all that unusual. That was a year ago, mind you...

LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

formatting link

Reply to
LRod

Just did an internet search on "C11H-12-4R" which is the version I got from McFeely's last year. If you can't find one for under $55, you aren't even trying.

formatting link
$52.75

formatting link
$54.95 (McFeeley's)

Have a ball. You'll love this square.

- - LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

formatting link

Reply to
LRod

Nope.

Reply to
CW

I hold mine up against the box that my AutoCAD 2000 came in.

UA100

Reply to
Unisaw A100

Most of my FIL's good tools were stolen by an evil in-law (outlaw?) but I did get his 24" Starrett. Nice, very nice. Ed

Reply to
Edwin Pawlowski

I've got one of these, I think. It's been accurate enough, but the markings are lightly etched into the surface of the rule, and are sometimes hard to read. Also, mine got a bit rusty, which makes it even worse

The better ones are actually engraved into the rule, I think.

Reply to
Henry Bibb

He's precise - just not accurate.

Reply to
mttt

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.