Ok, first of all...Thanks to everyone who took the time to respond. Here's
what I can gather from your various responses:
1) Make sure my saw blade is parallel to the mitre guage slots. Is there a
more accurate way to do this than just building a simple T-square type thing
that I would ride in the slot and make sure it touches the saw blade equally
at all points?
2) Double-check that there's no play in my runners. Will do.
3) If 1 & 2 don't eliminate the problem, I will replace the 2x4 with
something more stable to prevent the sled from flexing.
4) If 3 doesn't work, add a top to provide even more stability. I'm
guessing it would have to be something pretty hefty (but clear) to be
5) I guess I'm a little confused on 1 point. I thought the design of the
sled was to hold the stock against the front but Larry made it sound like
the wood runs against the back edge. Which is correct? (When building my
sled, I only checked the front board for perpendicularity to blade.)
If I understand you correctly, you are pushing the wood against the front
side of the sled. Before you do steps 1 to 4, try putting the stock to be
cut against the back of the sled. Closest to where you stand. That is the
correct place. Of course check the back side for perpendicularity to the
Either front or back is fine. In some ways it makes more sense to be
pushing everything forward... ;-)
IIRC Kelly Mehler's table saw book shows both front and back aligned
crosscut sleds. I don't have the book checked out from the library so I
can't check for sure. ;-)
My understanding is the Europeans favor the front models in both jigs and
sliding table construction, while US woodworkers favor the back.
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:16:10 +0000, Mark Jerde wrote:
I don't think I understand this. Unless the bed of the sled is very
narrow, if you put the workpiece against the back of the sled, aren't you
going to be hanging over the blade? That would make me nervous. And if
the bed is wide enough to accomodate larger workpieces, isn't a lot of
the sled going to be hanging precariously off the front of the table
before you make the cut?
I think we should clarify terms. The front of my saw is the part that
the operator's belt buckle hits when cutting. The front fence of my
sled is the fence that gets to the outfeed table first when cutting.
If the sled is completely sitting on the saw, the rear fence is
nearest the front of the saw.
When I make a sled, I rarely square the front fence, only the rear.
The front fence usually exists only to stiffen the sled. Some of my
smaller sleds don't even have a front fence.
That said, I just about always cut with the work held against the rear
(reference) fence, pushing it through the blade. Therefore I think
Ray and I are on the same page, I don't know which fence Mark is
calling the "front" fence. <G>
You must be a left-handed democrat? ;>)
It's like the "near" side of a horse ... it's a matter of perspective if
you're not a horseman. Actually, I think of it just the opposite when it
comes to fences on TS sleds, The front fence is the one nearest to me that I
hold the wood against, and the rear fence is that one way over there, past
Maybe we should start a TS sled convention designating your rear fence, and
my front fence, as the "near" fence?
Who says we don't "reach out" to each other? <g>
In (a) table saw book(s) I have seen crosscut sleds that use the far fence.
It is my understanding that is the configuration of both crosscut sleds and
crosscut tables preferred by the Europeans.
Well, there are standards of designations for moving things but some
people don't know them and don't use them. Unfortunately when talking
about moving and non moving things one can get mixed up. I agree that
the front of the saw is where the belt buckle is cause a saw doesn't
move. OTOH, a auto moves, so the front is the part that "arrives"
first and the right side of the a car assumes the person if facing the
way the car is driven. The right side of a stream also assumes that a
person is facing downstream. Thus the front of a sled is just like
a n auto, first part to arrive (at the saw). You could also talk
about the right side of a sled but that would be asking too much.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 02:06:42 GMT, "George E. Cawthon"
damnit, now I can't find the front of my house!
We've found an interesting confusion in RV's that ties in with your
Most folks think of the end with the hitch as the front when towing
it, but the side with the door is the front when you're camping...
No, that's just the entrance. The front is still the front, with the
hitch. You don't call the side of the car with the door the front, do
you, silly person? Oy vay. ;)
- Boldly going - * Wondrous Website Design
- nowhere. - * http://www.diversify.com
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:48:57 -0800, "Daniel Grieves"
If you have a dial indicator, you can mount it to the miter gauge
so it touches the blade. Check the reading at the front, rotate the
blade to the back, and check the reading again. Ed Bennett, one of
the Wreckers here, builds a fancy set for checking all the tools in
your shop, butcha gotta have a crowbar if you're like me. The $6
Harbor Freight indicator works just fine. You choose. The video he
has put together is great, and a really good value: $1.96 delivered
to your door. http://www.ts-aligner.com/newindex.htm
I used 1/2" Baltic Birch ply and put a piece of 1x4" oak on both ends.
It flexes only when I put a 6-8' stud on there to hack off. <g>
If you want to be EU safe and don't want to see what you're cutting.
(Pretty soon they'll have thought police there, too.)
So we're clear, I call the end which hits the saw first the front.
Because it's cut last, the back is closer to your body while feeding
the sled through. I nestle the board up against the backer board
closest to me. The front board is there to hold the two cut halves of
the sled together. The back is what should be aligned with the blade.
Did that help clarify things for you?
I've noticed a couple times that vibration in the saw (Dina can't
pass the -flat- nickel test due to an old jaw injury on her motor
pulley, but it's only about 1/4" off. ;) caused the board to float
out about 1/8" and I got a bind when I started the cut. I pay more
attention now to both finger and board placement.
* * Humorous T-shirts Online
* Norm's Got Strings * Wondrous Website Design
* * http://www.diversify.com
My way of checking that the blade is parallel to the miter gauge slot is as
MAKE SURE YOUR TABLE SAW IS UNPLUGGED WHILE PERFORMING THIS PROCEDURE.
I bought a cheap ($13.00) dial indicator from Harbor Freight, marked and
drilled a hole in the end of a 1X3 and mounted the dial indicator to it. I
clamped the 1X3/dial indicator assembly in my miter gauge (mine has a
hold-down but you can use a regular clamp) and marked a tooth on the blade
that was "set" toward the miter gauge. I held the bar of the miter gauge
tight against one side of the slot and slid the rig back and forth while
rotating the blade to make sure the dial indicator tip was in contact with
the same spot on the marked tooth both front and back
By doing this, I was able to reduce the arbor alignment error to only .003
inch. I could have gotten it closer with a little more effort but since the
blade itself had more than four times the runout, I figured that was good
I bought the dial indicator after struggling for three days...and many test
cuts...to set up my power miter box using a method similar to what you
I still have those feeler gages for those spark plug things we used to
change all the time in cars. If I care how far off is off.
Use your combo square riding the slot. Touch good, no touch bad, it's a
go/no go situation, since any error is bad.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:48:57 -0800, "Daniel Grieves"
that's the basic idea. you also want to account for any runout in the
blade itself, though. the way to do that is to pick a spot on the
blade near the rim and mark it with a felt tip pen. use that spot for
all of your measurements. raise the blade all of the way up to
increase it's length above the table. rotate the blade so your mark is
near the front and take a measurement of the distance from the blade
to the miter slot. rotate the blade so the mark is near the back and
take another measurement. compare the two measurements.
it sounds like it's time to post my sled again on ABPW. look for it
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:59:16 -0500, Daniel Grieves wrote:
I constructed that a sled using those plans a few months ago. I modified
things slightly, and it works excellent (although took a few iterations to
get it working well).
I'd recommend replacing your runner material with something harder. I
started with hard maple. These worked ok, but not great. I recently
upgraded to steel bar, available at the local BORG. This has made a huge
difference in overall stiffness and ease of sliding the sled. One problem
I had with the wooden runners was that they were very slightly warped, or
curved, so if the sled was square at the front of the cut, it was slightly
off by the end. This did cause some binding.
I'd also recommend attaching a piece of 2x4 or 2x6 protruding out the
back. This is similar to the 'tunnel' someone else mentioned, but a lot
simpler. The blade goes into the 2x4, and I always know where it will
end up after a cut. I don't have to worry about visually checking where
my hand is - I can do it by feel.
Try replacing the runners, and see if that helps. A working sled is well
worth the time invested.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.