Air-dried vs. Kiln-dried lumber

In a local Penny-Saver newspaper, an individual is offering air-dried cherry for a reasonable price. However, I am wondering if it would be stable enough for one to use in furniture construction. Will air-dried wood ever reach the proper moisture content of kiln-dried wood and is it worth the time, effort and risk if used in furniture? For example, if wood is air-dried for 1 year vice 5 years, will the wood aged longer be necessarily better (or the equal of kiln-dried wood)?

As I recall, a mill owner once told me that air drying alone is not sufficient to achieve stable lumber. Perhaps he had an axe to grind by this statement, however, a neutral opinion would be useful.

Thanks and Regards,

Reply to
TEF
Loading thread data ...

Don't take this as an expert opinion. However I do know woodworkers that use air dried lumber on a regular basis. They store it carefully in a warm, controlled environment and check the moisture content from time to time. When content is ok, they move it to the shop. One even has a pretty simple solar dryer in his back yard.

At the end of the day moisture content should be what counts and moisture meters are starting to be affordable.

Any other opinions?

Reply to
RonB

How did the dry wood before kilns? Isn't much of that funiture still around?

Dave

Reply to
TeamCasa

There is a visible difference in the character of some species, between kiln-dried and air-dried. Some find the air-dried character most appealing.

Kiln-drying often, not always, produces a more consistent, predictable outcome from the drying process. For most commercial operations, this is a desireable trait.

You have to decide what you want and need. For hobbyist quantities, if it were me, I'd call, and go see what the fellow has got to offer. There are many more variables to cherry than how it has been dried.

Good hunting!

Patriarch

Reply to
patriarch

A recent magazine article talked about this subject. Conclusion was, they both work well if dried properly. Kiln dried will absorb moisture in it must to reach equilibrium. The author did forgo air dried lumber for many years and now realizes what good bargains he passed up.

IIRC, it was either Wood or American Woodworker that had the article.

Reply to
Edwin Pawlowski

Check Hadley and FPL site for the graphs. The difference between air and kilned wood stored in the same relative humidity for a month is how they got to the current MC, not a difference in MC.

Air-dried cherry has a good six months' leg up on color over kilned in color after planing.

Build loose in dry weather, tight in damp.

Reply to
George

If the wood has been stored in an unheated space the key thing to do is to bring it into a heated space for a month or so before you start to work with it. During this adjustment time it should be stacked in a way that allows air to circulate around each board, so put spacers between the boards if they are in a stack. This adjustment time is a wise idea for both kiln-dried and air-dried wood but it's especially important for the latter because there's a bit better chance that when you get it the moisture content will be a bit high. This, of course, assumes that the wood was properly and adequately dried to start with -- you can get a good idea of whether it was properly dried by checking to make sure the boards are not warped, cracked, or otherwise in bad shape. If the wood has been drying for at least a year (for 4/4 boards) then you can be pretty confident that it will have reached equilibrium moisture levels with the air around it. Then you just need to finish the drying process by bringing it indoors.

I would not have any hesitation about using air-dried wood for furniture or other projects, in fact I've got some air-dried wood that I dried myself in a project in my shop now.

If you want to learn more about water and wood and lots of other topics useful to anyone who works with wood, I highly recommend R. Bruce Hoadley's book "Understanding Wood".

- Bruce

Reply to
Bruce Hooke

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.