We've done CFL's , what about LED's ?

Never been in a football ground, or a gig?

Blind?

Really? Even CRT TVs use phosphors that emit light with holes in the spectrum and LCD ones use fluorescent backlights (well those that don't use LEDs).

Light as we perceive it does though.

Reply to
dennis
Loading thread data ...

Try putting a white image on the TV and notice how it illuminates the room. In fact you can vary the colour quite a bit before the room colours look odd.

Reply to
dennis

A large percentage of men have defective colour vision.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk...

Oh no it doesn't!

Try reading this:

formatting link
at the graph labelled "Each curve represents the absorption properties of one type of human cone" and understand that "You will see people refer to the three cone types as blue, green, and red, and the absorption spectra are often color-coded that way. I purposely did not do that. You should never refer to the cone types with color names (e.g., =93red=94). As you=92ll see if both of us get through these web pages, it=92s a bad way to name them. Call them S, M, and L for short wavelength-sensitive, middle wavelength-sensitive and long wavelength- sensitive. "

Understand that although the pigments in our retinas have _peak_ sensitivities that coincide with particular parts of the spectrum, they are sensitive over broad swathes - they are not narrowband filters. You can see well into what is normally called the infra-red part of the spectrum if there is no shorter wavelength/higher frequency light around masking the infra-red. Granted, the pigment is not particularly sensitive at infra-red wavelengths, but there is enough of a response to see by. See

formatting link
Sid

Reply to
unopened

Mine isn't, when were you tested?

Reply to
dennis

A rule of thumb is 30% of males with blue eyes.

You can then add in the pig headed ones who simply don't notice colour subtleties.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

snipped-for-privacy@davenoise.co.uk...

Accurately, yours wasn't when tested; and conformed to the norms that were tested for. Colour vision can deteriorate over time, and there are illnesses that affect colour vision, as do some drugs (it is well known side effect of 1-[4-ethoxy-3-(6,7-dihydro-1-methyl-7-oxo-3- propyl-1H-pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl) phenylsulfonyl]-4- methylpiperazine citrate that it can cause cyanopsia (blue-tinted vision). The drug in question is the subject of many spam emails, so I'm not using the more common names). Be careful not to generalise from your particular case.

Cheers,

Sid

Reply to
unopened

Right. So it's just down to lack of perception. If you think all TVs look the same. There can be differences between two of the same make and model. Which can't be adjusted out.

Last sight test - about a year ago. You?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

Sure, BUT what about highly monochromatic objects.. Dayglo for example looks weird under artificial light. No UV to excite it.

If you have a three spike light source and a one spike color, you are in trouble.

But at least they have a SPECTRUM. Not half a dozen spikes scattered across one.

The LEDs probably have the best chance of

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Four weeks ago.

And yes I can see the differences in TVs and even in digital photos. They are not due to holes in the spectra though, but to manufacturing tolerances. And while they can't be adjusted out on CRTs as they vary across the screen, they can on digital monitors but seldom are as it requires more processing and extra hardware and has no real benefit for most uses.

Reply to
dennis

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.