OT: Organic Chemistry

Mar 18, 2018 14 Replies

Gentlemen,



As we all know, whenever a question arises concerning the origins of the universe, or the synthesis of complex macromolecules, the first place we turn for answers is uk.d-i-y, where hundreds of highly qualified scientists eagerly await the chance to address such recondite matters. I now set before them this apparently insoluble conundrum.



This apparently simple molecule doesn't exist in nature and cannot be synthesised in the structure shown. Why not?



Molecular formula: C3H6N2



Structure: H-N-C=C-C=N-H | | | | H H H H



(view in proportional font). A 10 shilling postal order will be sent to the poster with the correct solution.



A cursory google indicates that its generally found in a ring structrure ergo I would asume the ring is more stable

But really I haven't done ths s*it since 1968

How much do you need?

formatting link

There is a section titled "Vendors", which suggests the chemical was available once, but the links there don't really come up with anything positive.

In any case, I would expect the chemical to be tautomeric. I came up with this (how's your German?):

Is that worth a five bob postal order?

A not unreasonable assumption. And all the structures I've thus far seen have been annular, usually as components of 7-member heterocycles. The RSC's Chemspider site wont allow the linear conformation to be entered, though. Maybe their software's busted.

formatting link

There's stuff called 1,2-ethylenediamine. I don't know why I've heard of it. Is the propylene 1,3 version more stable than your proposal?

It would be:

H | H-N-C-C=C-N-H | | | | | H H H H H

With a bit more hydrogen. But I've no idea.

Why should I struggle to answer when you say you know it already? Why should I use a proportional font not fixed pitch? Why would I want obsolete currency? Why are you bothering this group?

At the risk of pointing out the obvious, if it's a struggle for you, simply don't bother!

ITYDM a non-proportional, ie fixed, font, actually!

Probably because as Einstein said. there are limits on genius, but not on stupidity. Brian

Precisely. He told us to use a proportional font.

It was fairly obvious that he meant the opposite, though.

Never the less RSC Chemspider does have it in its isomers database:

formatting link

Properties are only "predicted" so it seems unlikely that anyone has bothered to make it in sufficient quantity to actually measure them.

Molport shows that at least one linear isomer is stable enough to have once been sold as Acrylimidamide but not the one you specified.

H-C=C-C=N-H | | | H H N-H | H

formatting link

I am slightly bemused to find that 2-diazopropane was apparently once on sale (discontinued). I wonder how they shipped it to customers?

(CH3)2C=N=N

ISTR it has a half life of 3h at 0C if it doesn't explode first.

I'm no computer geek; far from it. Perhaps I should have said view it in plain text with a font such as Courier.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required