sorry I meant a 222-105 is 26.5mm, so you can fit a 773-173 plus a
222-104, but not a 222-106if you had a 173 in each side you could fit a 104 in each side and link them giving 6 positions for CPCs.
could be.
sorry I meant a 222-105 is 26.5mm, so you can fit a 773-173 plus a
222-104, but not a 222-106if you had a 173 in each side you could fit a 104 in each side and link them giving 6 positions for CPCs.
could be.
and 221
and 2273
Well if TLC?s measurements are correct then with a 773-173 in a Wagobox slot there is just enough space left to fit a 773-104 on top, just!
Richard
Just got an email back from Wago to confirm you can fit a 773-173 and a 773-104 in one slot, result!
Richard
I don't think it's TLC's measurements, those .PDFs look like single pages extracted from a larger Wago catalogue
or leaflets for the individual ranges?
And I should have said I've never found in one place the sizes across ranges in a convenient document. I did find a catalogue last year but it was a bit big at 716 pp and 90 MB. The WAGO connectors alone are spread across 30 or so pages.
Am I the only person who finds traditional junction boxes too easy to destroy the terminals by over-tightening and distorting them? Modern push-in terminals are much less easy to get wrong.
The cheap type of JB with the U shaped terminal, yes, especially if you try and squeeze in too many cables. But there are better (and more expensive) designs around.
Of course not. There are our apprentices.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required