Is This Damp Treatment Any Good?

formatting link
simple and apparently used at Westminster Abbey... :)

Finished result looks a bit unsightly, though.

Reply to
Ed_Zep
Loading thread data ...

Can't argue with the logic of it I suppose, but I didn't think porcelain was porous.

Ok for that old eyesore though

>
Reply to
Stuart Noble

================================ This subject was discussed here about a year ago and the informed opinion then was that they don't work.

I can't find a reference but I think there will soon be people along to give the technical details (for why they won't work) which were quite convincing as far as I remember.

Cic.

Reply to
Cicero

IIRC the conclusion was that you might just as well drill holes and not bother with the tubes :-)

Peter

Reply to
Peter Andrews

No. the tubes salt up and no furher evaporation can then occur. But youre thinking along the wrong path altogther. If there is a damp problem, it doesnt need a (steeply priced) magic treatment, it needs the cause putting right. It aint rocket science, just sort out whats gone wrong.

Theres a great deal of misinformation about damp n the world. It its an old house, try

formatting link

Reply to
meow2222

Perhaps someone should tell the conservationists at Westminster Abbey

Reply to
stuart_noble

Used to be called Doulton Wallguard. They went broke.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

A donation to the restoration fund can work wonders with conservationists.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

unglazed ceramic objects are cheap enough if anyone wants to try it.

NT

Reply to
meow2222

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.