In summary:
a. is it still sufficient to seal a new, metal consumer unit to meet IP ratings without using intumescent glands or the like?
b. is it worth adding something on this to the Wiki on ?Changing a consumer unit?? Cock-shy:
?Sealing
After you have tested you should check for gaps which would allow wires or fingers into the consumer unit.
The only formal requirement is to meet the IP codes [[link to
You do not have to use intumescent or fire resistant sealant etc.?
Background
- Reading the revised article on ?Changing a consumer unit? (as one is wont to do when in want of means of procrastination) I wondered about sealing a CU under the currents regs. Specifically, do the cable entries need to be fire resistant? And if so, what meets the standard?
- I don?t own the 18th edition but AIUI the requirement is still an ?enclosure manufactured from non-combustible material?. Nothing there about grommets, glands etc.
- But Wiring Matters[1] in 2015 had a piece which included:
"It is important for the installer to seal all openings into the enclosure or cabinet for cables, conduits, trunking or ducting that remain after the installation of cables - see Figure 6. The intent of the sealing is to ensure that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation 421.1.201. Good workmanship and proper materials must be used, and account must be taken of the manufacturer?s relevant instructions, if any.?
- That was depressing given I'm inclined to channel Jimmy "Yosser" Hughes. And wasn't brought up ?proper.
- But I finally came across another piece from the IET in 2015[2] that has a Q&A:
?When I put cables into a new metal consumer unit, do I have to use intumescent glands to enforce the fire protection of the consumer unit?
No, the metal consumer unit is designed to encase a fire within it and restrict the likelihood that a fire may spread. Manufactures? have carried out exhaustive tests on this issue and have found that the cable entry does not have to continue the fire rating of the consumer unit, for it to be effective. The only requirement is to keep IPXXD or IP4X on the horizontal surfaces (Reg 416.2.1) and IPXXB or IP2X on all other surfaces (Reg 416.2.2). Intumescent glands and sealants may be used to ensure the IP ratings are maintained, but they are not a requirement and existing methods of ensuring IP are acceptable.?
- But is that current - and likely to pass "good workmanship"?