I'm intending building a deck in my back garden this summer. It's going to be the full length of the conservatory at just over 14m by about 2m wide for ten of that 14. The rest is narrower where it goes round the "D" bit of the conservatory. The garden slopes a bit, so at one end, the deck will be only just above ground level, but at the other end it will be 30 or 40 cms above ground. I'm intending having a level wallplate fixed to the brick conservatory wall, and the bearers coming off that at 400 mm centres. I am going to have a 'leg' at every second bearer along the front, and probably the same on the alternate bearers, half way across the width, so at around
1m out from the wall. Rather than sinking these legs into the ground and concreting them all, I was thinking of bedding a row of 40 cm slabs on gravel or whatever, right along the front edge to serve as a solid base for the legs to stand on, as well as giving an edge for the grass, and something to mow up to. I would do a similar arrangement for the middle legs, but just with a slab at each position where a leg would be. Does this sound ok so far ?Now, my other query is with the material to use for the wall plate and bearers. The Wickes "How To" leaflet would suggest that if the deck is off the ground, then "treated stress graded joists" should be used. This seems a bit OTT to me. Treated I can live with, but joists seems a bit big and expensive to me. The 75 mm x 47 mm treated timber that they do is a reasonable price, and looks quite big enough to do the job, considering the amount of support I am intending giving it, and the fact that every deck board is double screwed at every bearer.
What's the general consensus on this from those of you who do this pro ? Is
75 x 47 going to be big enough to do the job, and is my plan to provide 'hard standing' for the legs, valid ?TIA
Arfa