Yes, but I wasn't really even referring to actual GI-Bill houses
themselves but that the overall demand for housing at that time was
tremendous and that demand alone predicated the abandonment of any
style of construction that wasn't the most efficient possible in time
and material -- and, specifically, that K&T was/is, if anything,
labor-intensive on installation. Was just trying to supply some
context to get Haller into at least the right half-century here.... :)
Was an interesting article in Fine Homebuilding a few months ago about
the CA boom and how the only way a crew could make a living was to be
absolutely the most efficient possible in everything. Was written by
one of the early framers so was mostly from that viewpoint, but quite
entertaining and informative, particularly if not old enough to
remember the era personally.
my friend will had his insurance company sold and the new company
checked every home.
currently a good friends main power line is in poor shape the cables
out covering is falling apart from age and the head looks bad too.
he is to cheap to replace it and upgrade.......... of course he has K&T
just the other day he admitted his home is a wreck. it doesnt belong to
him its tied up till his death in a 30 year estate thingy.....
since it really belongsa to no one none want to spend money on repairs
or upgrades. its a wierd situation
Well, we have a 30 year old rental property with fuses. We are "fixing it
up" because our tenant moved on after about 8 years.
We didn't "upgrade" before because we were short of cash (we used our extra
cash to get into a bigger house while keeping the old one as an investment.)
But now we have the time and money.
Our fusebox was on the small size with 12 single pole circuits plus two pole
circuits for the AC, stove, and clothes dryer. The two pole circuits have
two cartridge fuses in a holder.
The "upgrade" gets us:
1) MUCH better protection on the 240 volt circuits whereby a fault will
completely clear the circuit rather than leaving it "half hot." In the 10
years we lived there we only blew a fuse on the 240 volts circuits once; it
was from a loose wire inside the stove.
2) The potential to "un share" circuits as we can. Right now, for
example, the dishwasher shares a circuit with a counter outlet (or two or
3) The ability to add circuits. We want to put in an "over the oven"
microwave. Without the upgrade we would have to "share" an existing
4) Too much on one circuit: the house was wired with one fuse
controlling the "inner bath" lights AND the "sink outlet" AND the master
bedroom ceiling AND the bedroom outlets.
5) NO spares.
6) Temptation to overfuse. Most of the wires I looked at (at the
outlet/J-box) appear to be a lot of #14. The tenant doesn't have just 15
amp fuses in the box!
7) Occasional difficulty in restoring service after a fault. If you blow
a cartridge fuse, it can be hard to get what you want. And you never seem
to have the fuse you really want.
The bonus is the extra features you can get. The GFCI capability has been
mentioned. (Although I tend to prefer GFCIs on individual outlets.) The
"arc fault" breaker seems to me to offer some safety advantages. I noted,
however, that the kitchen counter GFCI seems to have been messed up by
crumbs from the toaster (or something?). Anyway, it didn't trip on the
test switch. (It didn't "Fail Safe.") But that's a different topic.
Also, at least one make has provisions for a "dual feed" to the main bus
whereby you have TWO "main" breakers. There is a mechanical interlock so
that only one breaker can be "ON" at any time. Basically, you have a VERY
high capacity transfer switch as part of your installation. Since my
rental is "in town" that's not so important as power there is reliable.
Among our "upgrades" will be the removal of the crappy "paneling" used in a
basement remodel. The junk wasn't rated for below grade use and it SHOWED.
I will have all the walls in the basement exposed before the electrician
comes for the upgrade. It will almost be like "New Work."
Often remodeling isn't cost effective. It's cheaper to sell you house and
buy another with better "stuff" than to upgrade your own home. But beyond
some point, the lack of upgrades will be such that no matter how well your
home "shows," it's basically a "fixer upper."
On 3 Jan 2007 05:26:52 -0800, email@example.com wrote:
Contact your insurance company, you might find they charge you a
little extra since you have fuses. Also check with your accountant if
there are any rebate, or tax benifits to upgrading your homes
Just some ideas.....
tom @ www.Consolidated-Loans.info
when its time to SELL
you either take a really low price selling as is or are then forced to
spend big bucks upgrading all the stuff you avoided spending money on.
so you styill spend it and probably more since inflation keeps on
driving up prices and sadly you still spend the money but get zip use
of it, if your finally fioxing up to sell.
That is a flawed logic over-generalization, too. The money not spent
on something unneeded was available for investment (or even other
discretionary use) for that period of time and very may well have
brought an equivalent or even higher return in the market than the
differential on the house.
The point is, while there are valid reasons for upgrading service,
"just because" isn't one of them.
You dont understand I recently sold a home about 90% of todays buyers
want move in turn key homes with no issues.
probably not true of most posters here, but we like home repairs.
elminate 90% of shoppers makes selling a LOT HARDER
do you really want fewer peoiple interested in your home ecause it
its really not a good idea to put off too much for time of sale
you might not have the bucks needed to do all that needs done
you might not have lots of time to do the upgrades
its often easy to avoid fixing or upgrading stuff, but some day you
have to pay the piper.
odd people think nothing of buying a new car every 6 years at maybe 15
grand a shot but get all distraught about spending a grand upgrading
their homes electrical system. heck atr ;least homes appreciate,
vehicles just go down in value
My wifes cobalt was under that but my real point is most folks buy and
trade, so the actual lowball cost might be 15 grand a pop.
like I said think of ALL the stuff you spend money on in a lifetime why
should your homes electrical system be starved? it because its hidden
and you cant see it......
if it was the focal point of your living room you wouldnt object to
spending big bucks....
or sitting in your driveway, again its a display thing.
Again I reiterate -- no, this is a false analogy. I have items in my
living room I look at every day that are 100 years old and are not
going to be replaced (in fact, for some of them, their inherent value
is tied directly to both that age and would be almost completely
destroyed if they were to be "upgraded" and/or modified. The point is
that _UNLESS_ there is an actual reason other than "because" there are
more cost-effective places to put the investment and most people
And when the day comes, so be it. Until then, better investments are
likely to be had elsewhere. Making those wisely takes care of the
Again, I reiterate. There are reasons for upgrading. OP gave none
that qualify including no indication of an anticipated need or desire
to sell. You throw out straw men of "maybes" and "what ifs" and
"future will be's". I have no problem w/ upgrading for any of the
several circumstances previously itemized and a potential sale is
possibly one altho rather far down on my list. Rarely, however, would
that be such a precipitous event that w/ even the barest modicum of
planning it couldn't be accommodated in a timely fashion if deemed
desirable a priori. In most instances unless there is a serious
problem which as I have already agreed _should_ have been previously
resolved, it is plenty early enough to have it be part of any
negotiations given an offer in hand. You can accept an offer, reject
an offer, provide a counter-offer and get the value you think
necessary. If you're uncomfortable enough about dealing with it in
that fashion so you want to do something ahead of time, then again,
fine; that's your privilege. Just don't try to make it that your way
is the only way as others simply don't see the world w/ the same set of
Possibly. What fraction of household electrical fires are
fuse-panel-related/caused to begin with? What fraction would
replacement of the fuse panel w/ a circuit breaker panel prevent? What
fraction of those would a arc-fault breaker of those prevent that?
I don't have statistics, but I'd venture the relative risk of the
automobile being involved in an accident is multiple times that of the
fire risk that a replacement fuse panel would have prevented so the
differential benefit is heavily weighted on the side of the car vis a
vis the panel.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.