Did everyone see the recent episode on the subject show where the
plumbing guy visited the plumbing parts manufacturer and they showed
him how they tested (among other things) toilets?
No wonder we have such hopeless toilets. They tried golf balls and,
wow, it passed all of them. And then little pieces of hose and again
wow, they all passed (for the sarcasm-impaired, this is sarcastic).
And then they had a bunch of single sheets of toilet paper and
those--wow--passed as well. A couple of other equally useless tests
the details I don't remember and of course the dumper passed those
(If only people would ask me....<g>) In the case of toilet paper what
they should have tested are three feet of paper wadded up and glued
(loosely) together, and another three foot piece similarly wadded into
a couple of inches, and another...about five in total. Then put in a
couple of ripe, peeled but uncut bananas. Let all this settle for a
couple of minutes to simulate the reading of yet another chapter of
War and Peace and then flush. Break out the plunger!
To simulate certain members of my family a banana is only about half
the required size (length and diameter) so the mfg is getting off
snipped-for-privacy@HorribleISP.gov (SpamFree) writes:
| Did everyone see the recent episode on the subject show where the
| plumbing guy visited the plumbing parts manufacturer and they showed
| him how they tested (among other things) toilets?
I don't know about everyone, but I saw it.
| And then they had a bunch of single sheets of toilet paper and
| those--wow--passed as well.
I think the paper was actually wadded.
What I would like to have seen is a simple dye test. Drop in some food
coloring. Mix. Flush. On the low-flush toilet that came with my house
the water would not be clear after a single flush...
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:11:52 +0000, Dan Lanciani wrote:
We need a new bathroom fixture: a combination faucet and bucket hook, with
a volumetric valve to automatically refill the bucket. That way, you
would always have an extra gallon or two of water to make that damn
Federally-mandated "water saving" toilet actually work when you really
need it to. For the rest of the world: it is now _illegal_ in the United
States to install an old-style 3-gallons-per-flush toilet.
Most if not all new toilets have that built in. Try holding the handle
down for a few extra seconds.
Frankly, while there was a real problem with the early models, today the
problem is not really low water usage, it is a matter of poor and cheap
design. Most everyone has the standard contractor toilet. Cheap is the
word to describe them. There are plenty of, not too expensive, models out
there with very good designs (including large fully glazed traps) available
This is but another example of our government working at cross-purposes.
On the one hand, as you point out, there are federal regulations on toilets
designed to conserve water.
On the other hand, there are minions in the government encouraging us to eat
more fruits and vegetables.
Now fruits and vegetables generate a lot of "floaters," whereas meat (yum)
generate more "sinkers."
The "sinkers" flush easily, whereas the "floaters" are difficult to wash
down, resulting in more flushes and, in extreme cases, having to be removed
from the bowl by hand!
There ought to be a department of "Setting Priorities."
To boost show ratings they could have a different cast member use the
toilet (do their duty) on camera and show people how not to clog it up.
They could begin with Rich who installs them. He could then jump on the
toilet and test it immediately.
Yes, I like this idea. I think a camera should also be mounted in the
bowl. Then they could have a sweepstakes to see what viewer can
identify which show personality, based upon ass and stool
characteristics. Like I bet Norm has a big fat pasty white hairy ass,
and his turds are probably huge. Bob, on the other hand, probably has a
tanned ass, and rarely if ever takes a shit.
They could even base a reality show on this..... contestants would have
to crap in dangerous places, like in a lions den or maybe from a
highwire; or face eviction from the island. Whoever craps the biggest
would be tribal leader.
This is great! You know if Norm let loose a big one, he can use one of his
many power tools to cut it up into smaller pieces.
They could also use their poops on "Ask this Old House" where they usually
discuss weird looking things and what they are. They could discusss their
They could also sneak into the homes of the ladies and leave them a gift in
their toilets. Then set up a hidden camera and watch if she screams when
she opens the toilet lid.
Gee the possibilities are endless.
Sort of like candid toilet cam!
Hell yes. If they bought seinfeld, this would surely get picked up. An
even wackier idea would be to leave them a gift in the bathroom or
kitchen sink, perhaps even on a counter or the floor. And then on
halloween, they could set up in a single persons house; wait till the
person went in the shower, and then put a turd in the toilet. That
would really scare people.
Glad to see that you are a student of 'what goes down the toilet bowl'.
I remember once, when I was working in a machine shop, a LARGE piece of
human excrement got stuck in the bowl. The guy who noticed this passed
the word around about what he had seen and several of the guys went
into the rest room with calipers and actually MEASURED it.
Then, of course, there was a lot of spectulation as to who could have
I agree with your testing comments, however... about a week ago, we had the
American Standard Champion installed. We haven't had a clog yet. There have
been occasions where the old toilet definitely would have clogged.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.