Unless you are somewhere it is extremely cold the furnace did not run all year long but the water heater did. Any problems during the time the months when the furnace was not running? Don't think it will be a problem unless bricks missing from flue.
When I put in my new furnace back in '03 the high efficiency units were not terribly reliable - several friends and my brother had to replace them in 4-7 years. My furnace was about 33 years old and I had already replaced the blower motor - and since I was involved in the addition and renovations at the house next door and they needed a new furnace installed, I worked a deal with the HVAC contractor and had mine done at the same time. I put in a Tempstar non condensing 2 stage with DC variable speed blower. My gas bill didn't change at all, but my hydro bill dropped. Last year is the first time my annual gas bill hit $750 (furnace, water heater, and BarB Q). Had a noisy eductor fan that I fixed by brazing the squirrel cage to the hub - other than that it's been 100%.
Going to the high efficiency you MIGHT save 10% on your gas bill. If you don't have the brushless dc motors, definitely go for them on the new furnace. The electrical savings will be greater than your gas savings going to the condensing furnace (which is all we can buy now)
Considering that my energy bill ( combined gas and electric) can be up to $400 a month here in Wisconsin...if I saved anywhere near 10% it would be quite helpful
That was my thinking too...the furnace does not run in the summer and of course even in the winter, the furnace and water heater would rarely be running at the same time. The chimney was replaced maybe 20 years ago and is still like new. The original had been running without a liner for 100 years when I had it replaced and it was still intact.
I'm assuming by "going to high efficiency" you mean choosing a condensing high efficiency versus an 80% non-condensing. The test data and math says you're going to save a lot more than 10%. A non-condensing is 80% efficient. The condensing one Philo is looking at is 96% efficient. That's a 20% difference. If you spend $1000 a year, it doesn't take long for that to more than pay for the increased cost of the higher efficiency furnace.
Like I said, when I replaced my 27 year old gas furnace, my bills dropped by 40%+. CL's math is off. Even with a brand new 80%, your 96% unit would use ~20% less gas. Condensing makes a big difference. That steam that goes up the chimney on a non-condensing contains a lot of heat. I know Ed, who has a boiler has reported substantial savings too. Let us know what you find, this will be a good test, still have winter left. But you might want to record the meter reading when they put the new one in so you can start measuring for a month. If you wait for the bill, you likely won't have a full month of the new furnace.
There are two issues. One is the chimney is supposed to be sized to the appliances to provide the proper draft. The other, related issue, that's a big one, is that the chimney will be too large to accomodate the two appliances. With just the WH, the gasses will cool too much and condense in the chimney in winter. The condensate is acidic and over time, it will destroy the chimney, eating away at mortar at the liner joints, etc. If the chimney is entirely within a heated area of the building, then it's not a problem, but few chimneys are.
When I did my furnace, I installed an aluminum liner for the WH myself. It was easy. I think it cost about $100 for the kit. Stainless would last longer, but it's a lot more money. And I figured the WH probably had another 7 years or so left in it, at that point I could revisit the issue, maybe go to direct vent, etc.
IDK what the cost of electric is there, but NG is by far the lowest cost to heat water most places. And with energy trends, it looks like electric is more likely to rise more in the years ahead than NG. If it were me and I was eliminating the chimney, I'd go with a direct vent.
He's right.
so I am not going to
So, how lucky do you feel? Those eventually type things have a way of taking a long time or never happening and meanwhile the chimney is slowly being damaged. What's a new chimney cost compared to a liner?
Again, the problem here is that before you had a big, honking furnace going up a big honking chimney. When it's cold outside, the furnace ran, keeping the chimney warm. That prevented the gases from the furnace and the WH from condensing inside the chimney. Now you'll have a big honking chimney and just a WH. The WH alone can't keep the big chimney warm. The WH gasses will cool and condense and the condensate is acidic. It will attack mortar joints and anything similar in the chimney and over time, destroy it. The process will start immediately. How long it takes for real trouble to emerge probably depends on a lot of factors. How lucky do you feel?
I've had good experiences with Goodman. Simple, reasonably well made, and they use common parts.
Unlike the proprietary Trane odd one off parts.
- . Christopher A. Young learn more about Jesus .
We have some kind of deregulation in PRNY, and different energy providers are different price. I found out by comparing that I could have saved $103 on last month's bill by switching. I did switch, but they can only change over at meter reads, so I get the expensive ESCO for another month.
- . Christopher A. Young learn more about Jesus .
I know what you're thinking, punk. Was it corroded out in five years, or was it six?
Nothing around here is going to be too scientific because my wife is convinced that since the furnace is higher efficiency , she can turn the heat up higher.
I can get pretty good data from my energy bill as they compare this years usage to last and plot calculate the average monthly temperature
On 01/23/2015 06:13 AM, trader_4 wrote: X
Yep, and the energy bills here are way more than $1000 a year...(gas and electric combined) was $2500 last year.
Even if only a 10% savings, the furnace will soon pay for itself but it should be more I hope.
Still amazed that it was only a few hundred dollars more than what I paid 23 years ago.
Where are you? I'm East of Stevens Point?
Here is my thinking:
The original chimney lasted over 100 years. (and I had it replaced as a precaution as it was only mildly deteriorated)
The one now in place is about 20 years old and still like new.
Within the next five years or so I'll be due for a new water heater...which will be a non-chimney type.
Next project will be a new roof and at that time the chimney will be removed entirely.
Very lucky since the chimney will be removed entirely within the next five years or so (see my other reply)
On 01/23/2015 06:33 AM, trader_4 wrote: X
end up getting an electric water heater and completely
My wife and I use very little hot water so this will not be terribly critical but will strongly consider the direct vent gas WH
No dishwasher and always do cold water laundry. Since I'm bald no long time in the shower washing my hair.
So basically if she can take a couple of showers a week that's about all the hot water use we need.
thank you
Right in Milwaukee not too far from the lake.
Keeps things a bit cooler in the summer
Given that plan and timeline my first thought is you're probably OK, because it's more of a long term thing. But then who knows.....
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.