Some serious DIY modelling!

[The Natural Philosopher]

But as we all know, you dont know any.

[dennis]

But people that do know physics, know that I know a lot more than you.

Do you want and try to argue about what you can do and what you can't do when detecting stealth aircraft then?

[dennis]

As I said its basic physics, do you want to argue that it doesn't work?

[The Natural Philosopher]

Not especially, no.

BUT they are the shape they are for radar reasons. It dpoesn't affect stability.

[The Wanderer]

Obfuscation. The question asked only requires a simple yes or no.

[dennis]

Of course it affects their aerodynamics, that is bleeding obvious to anyone. Their aerodynamics affects their stability and how hard they are to control, that is also bleeding obvious. So why do you think it doesn't?

The facts are as I stated.. they are that shape because the CAD programs and technologies they used to make their radar characteristics could only cope with angled surfaces. The use of those shapes makes the aerodynamics cr@p which is why they have to use fly by wire with the computers controlling the planes surfaces. Everybody else knows this is the case except you.

[geoff]

In message , "dennis@home" writes

You seem to be missing his fairly obvious observation that its you, not the physics, which is the problem

[dennis]

Well the answer is yes, I have a degree in physics from Imperial College as it happens.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Bullshit.

[The Wanderer]

You still haven't answered the question. Do you (or did you) work in this field?

[dennis]

What has working in physics got to do with anything? Either you understand that you can detect the changes or you don't. The people that design these things know of the problems and use standoff weapons when possible. You don't think they would use cruise missiles if they could use cheap laser guided bombs?

[The Wanderer]

Oh, I wouldn't dream of lecturing others on matters on which I know very little.

I merely note that you've been asked several times whether you have ever worked in the aviation field and each time you've obfuscated and failed to come up with a direct answer. That tells everyone exactly what they need to know.

[Tim Streater]

That didn't seem to bother Biggles.

[Bob Eager]

He does this wriggling trick (avoiding the question, then pretending he's misunderstood and answering a different one) time and again. I doubt he's qualified to dig a hole.

[dennis]

But you will accuse others of not knowing anything even though you don't have the knowledge to know if what they say is true?

What it tells people is that you are looking for an excuse to try and discredit someone because they don't agree with you.

[dennis]

Just because you can't understand the answer doesn't mean I have not answered it.

Take the aviation field question above.. I was talking about physics and he asked if I had worked in this field, he could just as easily be asking me if I worked on stealth, radar, aerodynamics, computer control systems, etc. all of which were in the discussion but it appears he meant aviation even though he didn't ask that.

[Jules]

is it your own and/or not printed out on Tesco Value paper?

[Bob Eager]

Well, now you have finally understood...have you worked the the aviation field (in a technical capacity, not making the tea or sweeping the floor)?

[Tim Streater]

What makes you think he doesn't have a physics degree or that he didn't get it at Imperial?

[Dave]

Denis said

I said

Do you work in this field then?

I think this is clear enough.

Dave