LOL! You've been reading Harry! What's worse, you've been taking him seriously! As Whisky-Dave points out, Denmark only produces 30% of it's power from wind, although that may be out-of-date, as this Wiki item suggests a figure of nearly 40% for 2014.
Some stuff I've put up before:
Denmark has quite a lot of coal-fired power stations; see
The International Energy Agency web site on Key World Statistics for energy production and consumption. The latest document they've produced is here:
Download the pdf file, click on EMISSIONS on the LHS, and scroll down to the table of Selected Energy Indicators for 2011 where one finds a column of data for CO2/pop., i.e. CO2 emissions in tonnes per head of population. The data for Denmark, UK and France are as follows (pp.
51, 57 & 51 respectively):Denmark 7.48 t CO2/capita UK 7.06 " France 5.04 "
(CO2 emissions from fuel combustion only. Emissions are calculated using the IEA?s energy balances and the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines). So the UK is actually emitting *less* CO2/capita than Denmark *in total*, despite all their wind power! France's CO2/capita, as expected, is well down, showing the benefits of nuclear.
AIUI there are occasions when Denmark produces more electricity than it uses, when it exports the surplus. But equally well, there are other times when it cannot produce enough for its needs (when the wind don't blow, for example), when it imports nuclear-generated electricity from France, and hydroelectric power from Norway and Sweden via inter-connectors. If it were not for France and Norway/Sweden, Denmark would be in deep doo-dah at these times. There's only a certain amount of surplus electricity available in Europe, so not everyone can rely on doing what Denmark does. With Germany closing its nuclear generators and relying increasingly on wind, surplus electricity in Europe is going to be scarce. It won't be long before the shit hits the fan, or should that be the wind-generator.