They lost control of energy prices when the various energy industries were sold off. He has no chance of enacting this.
They lost control of energy prices when the various energy industries were sold off. He has no chance of enacting this.
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 13:21 The Natural Philosopher wrote in uk.d- i-y:
Nearest I could think of is go back to a victorian system: You either work, starve to death or be lobbed into a poorhouse and made to work.
Not very nice though...
Even if you gave either Cameron or Osborne gloves with left and right marked on them they'd still not know which was which without substantial external assistance.
How much "nice" can we afford?
It never stopped Hugo Chavez
Who was it that called that manifesto 'the longest suicide note in history'?
Better still, give all the politicians boxing gloves and completely ruin their sex lives.
I thought Digby Jones came up with a very sensible response on R4 today.
A lot less than will get you elected. Which is a catch 22 and is why we WILL get disaster.
The sheeple will keep electing people they think will save them from reality, until reality kills them.
On Wednesday 25 September 2013 18:02 Huge wrote in uk.d-i-y:
I was hoping slightly more than that...
The welfare state is a great thing in itself. The sad thing is that someone always has to spoil the party by being selfish.
what was it, he hasn't come up with much sensible stuff in the past.
And Venezuela is f***ed a s a result. Socialists never learn.
a) 'go f*ck yourself ed' b) 'even thatcher wasn't quite this mad' c) 'my sides have just split with laughter' d) 'a prime policy plucked from Camerons think tank'
Cheap petrol though :)
Neither do politicians of any leaning
Those socialist politicians Kinnock and Bliar learnt how to capitalise in a big way.
0.10/litre when I was there. Everybody was running beat up Yank V8s.
And shortages of everything else.
Socialist politicians my arse.
One thing which irritates me, is the (unchallenged by the media) posturing of the energy company saying "if we didn't make such large profits, we couldn't invest".
Now I may be a bit simple, but where I come from money you invest in your business is counted *before* you get profit. So the reality is by making such profits, they company are actually doing the exact opposite - and denying money to investment.
I wonder if there's any merit in scrapping corporation tax, and simply having a 50% tax on money allocated to dividends ?
Indeed. They also exhibit a lack of knowledge about the location of arse and elbow.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.