The media likes to exaggerate things. Apparently to get more people to watch their coverage and thus increase their ratings. This seems to be the name of the game lately.
Just recently they were predicting a major blizzard, with white-out conditions, high winds, extreme drifting, and more..... They said to stay off the roads. This was predicted to occur at a certain time. The end result occurred 6 hours later than their predicted time. It snowed, and was fairly heavy at times, but no where close to a "white-out". It was windy and of course there was some drifting as a result. I happened to be driving home at the time, and had no problem driving. In the end, it was just a common winter snow storm, with some wind and drifting. No biggie!
In the past, I have seen REAL Blizzards, as well as "white-outs", and drifts so high you could not even walk thru them. I still recall getting trapped on a storm like that, while driving and not only did I have to park my car and wait over two hours for the storm to lighten, but also had to turn around and head home, knowing I'd never get to my destination. Then it took almost 3 hours to drive about 10 miles.
BIG DIFFERENCE !!!
Exaggeration seems to be the name of the game, when it comes to media coverage these days. Just like last year there was a local house fire. The news said "it burned to the ground". I saw the house the next day. The entire house was still standing, roof intact, but noticable charred siding from all the windows on one side of the house. "Burned to the Ground" means NOTHING IS LEFT! There was an entire house still standing, but with serious damage. (Since then, this house has been repaired. It was resided, new windows, and I suppose the whole interior was gutted and replaced). Obviously the structure remained sound, or they would have demolished it....