Inexpensive replacement for these garage flourescent lights?

Thanks for confirming. The funny thing is that the only difference is the diameter (and the wattage), so, it's odd that they're "obsolete" just because they're a bit fatter.

What's so bad about a 40W tube versus a 32W tube? Is the 8 watts really a big deal?

Or is there some other reason to ban "fat" tubes?

Since I think I have two bad ballasts, the single four-lamp ballast for 20 bucks is what I'm gonna get tomorrow at Home Depot (if they have it).

I measured the T8 LED with a ruler and it was close to one inch, but the T12 was off by a lot. It was 1-3/8ths of an inch, or a T11 in diameter.

Hmmm... that sounds like exactly the same setup, only different colors. I guess the colors actually "mean" something then... 'cuz color is the only difference on the outside.

Thank you for that hint, as I did not know that. They never taught me anything about this stuff in school.

Given out of 16 bulbs I took out, only about half were still working, so I'm surprised only one ballast was outright dead (with another suspect).

Reply to
Bill Moinihan
Loading thread data ...

I don't know anything about LED tubes but if it was "direct wire" that might be better because who needs the ballast anyway?

I don't even understand what the ballast even does, in the case of the LED tubes.

Do you?

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

You need to get the bulbs to match the ballast which in this case is 'instant start'. I have not bought any floursecent bulbs ina while, but the last time I bought them seems that I could get a box of 12 for only a little more than 4 bulbs.

If going to the LED type bulbs you may not even need the ballast. I have not replaced any flourscent with the LED in the same fixture so can not comment on that.

Reply to
Ralph Mowery

It could be the 8 watts or more likely the makeup of the tube. Less glass and material. The tubes do contain mercury so less of that to deal with. They kept cutting down on the mercury in the t12 tubes and someetimes they would not start up if it was much below 50 deg F. Not sure of the makeup of the coating on the inside ot the tubes, but less used there also.

I worked in a large company that had thousands of bulbs. Toward the last of the t12 tubes we had many that would not start up and this was in a room that was over 70 deg F.

Reply to
Ralph Mowery

It's not obvious why they banned 40 Watts but kept 32 Watts (which seems miniscule of a difference).

Googling, I found this: Why did US Department of Energy discontinued the T12 lights?

formatting link

Here is a direct quote of the main reason: "T12 light bulbs were becoming extremely inefficient"

Here is a second direct quote of the secondary reason: "Polychlorinaed Biphenyls are used in T12 fixture ballast manufacturing"

Huh? Why would a T12 ballast use PCBs while a T8 ballast wouldn't? Makes no sense to me. Does it make sense to you?

Googling some more, I find this: The Case Against T12 Bulbs that Invited the Ban

formatting link

Which says (verbatim): "the conventional four-foot T12 lamp still consumes a whopping 40 watts every hour. On the other hand, the more modern T8 lamp consumes anything between 25 and 32 watts of energy in an hour."

So I guess the 8 watts mattered to the DOE.

SImilarly, it says "The T12 lamps are not long-lasting", but, since when does the DOE care about how long bulbs last (especially since incandescents don't last all that long either).

Now we get to the hazardous waste where it says "T12 lamps release toxic mercury and PCB waste products".

Huh? Why would T12s release more of these than T8s?

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

I only yesterday figured out how (by looking it up) a legacy ballast works with LED tubes, but I couldn't find an article that explains how it works with LEDs.

Thanks for providing that reference information. I have to admit, the two 4-bulb lamps currently with the LEDs in them are brighter than the sun it seems, at least in a garage they are.

Compared to the fluorescents, they rock with light output!

I just hope they last, given they are T8s on a T12 ballast.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

It would be nice if I can just cut out the ballast altogether. Maybe the LED bulbs work with or without the ballast? I'll call Feit tomorrow to ask if that's possible.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

Reading more, I think they are just making most of this stuff up.

This article lists all the stuff that was retired:

formatting link

100 watt and 150 watt incandescent A-lamp ? banned January 1, 2012 75 watt incandescent A-lamp ? banned January 1, 2013 60 watt incandescent A-lamp ? banned January 1, 2014 40 watt incandescent A-lamp ? banned January 1, 2014

T8 single-pin fluorescent 8 foot slim and high-output ? banned January

2009 Most reflector lamps over 50 watts (except some 65W) ? July 1, 2010 Magnetic ballasts for many standard fluorescent lamps ? July 1, 2010 T12 fluorescent tubes 4 foot ? banned July 14, 2012 T12 fluorescent tubes 2 foot U-Bend ? banned July 14, 2012 T12 fluorescent tubes 8 foot (slim and high output)? banned July 14, 2012 T8 with low CRI ? banned July 14, 2012 (DOE changed CRI to 87 in April 2011) PAR20, PAR30, PAR38 Halogen standard lamps (within 40W to 205W) ? banned July 14, 2012

So it just seems to be an "efficiency" thing since they all have different secondary reasons.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

That article lists:

- The package components yellow

- Thermal expansion & contraction cause components to crack

- Phosphor degeneration

- Nucleation

- EM

- ionizing radiation

- Metal melting on the chip

- Whiskers shorting out traces

- thermal runaway

- current crowding

- electrostatic discharge

- reverse bias

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

This bulb seems to simply require me to "bypass the ballast":

formatting link

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

Bill,

Your package photo shows a lumen output of just 1700 lumens, compared to around 2800 lumens for a fluorescent bulb. So technically it's putting out LESS light.

Your old bulbs were probably dimming with age and giving off a bit more of a "warm" glow. Your new LED's have a whiter light, which can make them seem brighter when they really aren't.

In any case, as long as you're happy with the light output it doesn't really matter.

Take care,

Anthony Watson

formatting link
formatting link

Reply to
HerHusband

Yes, definitely. I was horrified to discover how inefficient old T12 ballasts were. When I did my LED retrofit, I made before/after measurements. I was using 32W-rated T12 lamps, and the old 2-lamp ballast drew 103W!!! Yikes, I would have done this sooner if I had known!

Using a commercial 350 mA LED lighting power supply on a string of 20 "1 W" LEDs to replace the two-lamp set, it drew 21 W. The light output is probably less than two new T12 lamps, but plenty of light for a kitchen, with 3 of these 2-lamp fixtures.

Well, I'm totally happy with my 20-LED strings. Color temperature is much better than I expected, nobody has complained at all. Light output is fine, and you can't beat 21 W line draw for the equivalent of 2 T12 lamps.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Elson

Well, T12 ballasts made before 1977 or so MIGHT have had PCBs in them, but more likely it was phased out a decade before that. Certainly, no NEW ballasts have had any PCB content for decades.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Elson

Thanks for noticing that detail. The old bulbs must have been dimmed, as you noted, over time. The new light is bright, by comparison.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

Yikes! I guess I should replace the T12 ballasts with T8 electronic ballasts.

If there's a sale on em... I will. :)

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

Thanks for that update.

After reading a few of these articles, and after noting that the government bans *plenty* of other bulbs (which don't have ballasts), the *real* reason is just the energy efficiency, I'm sure.

I guess the write of that article I referenced needed more words, so they went on about PCBs, but, that's not the real reason.

They even banned some T8 bulbs, for example. And Halogens. And incandescent.

So, it's all about energy.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

On 11/03/2016 3:16 PM, Bill Moinihan wrote: ...

No, it's "all for the children"...

Reply to
dpb

For starters, I have eyes. I can see color, flicker and easily note bad quality lighting, which most LED units are.

Yeah, right, the brightness only drops after 50,000 hours.

get real.

Reply to
Cydrome Leader

I probably am not as discerning as you are, and, we should remember, this is a "garage" so, it's not a "reading light" or a "mood light" by any stretch of the imagination.

So, for a garage, I can only safely say that the light output from four of these LED T8 bulbs driven by magnetic T12 ballasts is far brighter and less flickery than four T12 fluorescent bulbs which are a few years old.

Sure, I'm comparing old to new, but that's what I have to compare.

I don't notice ANY flicker, although I hear a faint hum, which is probably from the T12 ballast being squeezed at 120 cycles per second.

It's certainly *white* light, far whiter than the (ols) fluorescents were. The price was about 3 times what a replacement fluorescent would cost.

Over time, I'd be forced to replace the T12s anyway, so,

You are correct in that the brightness of LEDs diminishes from day 1, mostly due to fundamental cracks growing between crystals, so the "lifetime" is supposed to be to the L70, which is the point at which the LED is at 70% of its original brightness.

Reply to
Bill Moinihan

Stop purchasing your lamps from China and maybe your eyes will see something better.

Reply to
Meanie

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.