Assume underground metal water service pipe (10ft...) and a ground rod.
Your original statement was:
The underground water service pipe is REQUIRED by the 250.50 to be included as a grounding electrode. It has been thus fire was invented. Bonding requirements under 250.104-A (not 250.80) have been already met under the more stringent 250.50. The code clearly requires the water service pipe to be a grounding electrode. The water pipe clearly provides ?A GROUND FOR THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM.?
If 250.104 was removed, the connection would still have to be made. If the water service pipe was plastic 250.104 would prevail.
Both Brad and AZNomad said the water pipe was a grounding electode. So far no one agrees with you.
You said: > The ground rod is the *primary* grounding > electrode, and the water piping is the supplemental electrode.
250.53-D-2. requires a "supplemental" electrode - your ground rod. The water pipe is clearly superior based on the size of grounding electrode conductor required for each electrode and by typical earth resistances.You said: > You're also wrong about the reason The NFPA Handbook said the rod was there because the water pipe might be replaced in the future with plastic with the rod as a "supplementary" fall-back.
I'm not sure why you're having so much trouble grasping this.
bud--