On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 21:05:19 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
I would be interested in other opinions about whether this** is making
good. He gave a price based on what he did, or planned to do. Did
soethign happen that made him not close the gables when he had
intended to. Or did he just think they didn't need closing?
If the latter, why should he have to do that now for free, or for
whatever compromise price you have in mind?
**I'll admit I'm not positive about what you have in mind.
It's not like he did something but did it wrong. He didnt' do
anything to your gables, right? So he didn't charge you for doing
anything to them, I would hope.
To close a gable, doesn't one just nail a piece of plywood to the
inside. But I think the big problem might be challenging his opinion
of what you need.
Like I say, what is the underlying problem? Is it hotter in the attic
than it should be? It's not hot yet in Baltimore, and I don't
remember what the fan thermostat is set at, but I think my attic gets
to be about 10 degrees hotter in the middle of the day than the fan is
set for, or than the outside temp, whichever is higher. But I've
never measured. I will if you want me too.
Beats me. Until this problem was discovered I didn't know diddly squat about
attic vents. I assumed that the person I paid to do the job would do it
correctly. I wouldn't have known to ask about the gable vents and relied on
When the guy I had come out to diagnose the problem gave me his opinion, I
asked him directly if the roofer who did the job had been negligent in not
closing the gable vents. He said yes, he was. If that's the case, his
mistake is going to cost me a good deal of money. It seems to me that his
negligence, if that's what it was, is the cause of the damage. Why should I
be responsible for paying any part of it?
It's not what he did, it's what he didn't do. Failing to do something you're
supposed to is just as bad as doing something you're not supposed to.
IMO, I find it very hard to believe that adding can vents to an attic
that already has gable vents and soffit vents is responsible for
moisture causing roof failure. The flow of air is from the soffits up.
Previously it went only out the gables, now it can flow out those plus
the can vents. You'd have to have a hell of a lot of moisture coming
from somewhere to get enough moisture to create a problem. There are
millions of homes that have all kinds of mixes of attic ventilation and
this is the first one I've every heard of where adding more vents
created a moisture problem. And exactly what in the roof is failing?
Sounds like it's the plywood rotting?
I would make sure all sources of moisture have been identified. Where
do all the bath exhaust fans go? It's not unusual to see these either
discharged incorrectly into the attic or routed to a soffit, with the
hose just laying next to the existing soffit, rather than have a proper
I'd get a good home inspector in to take a look at the problem and give
You're assuming the air is flowing out of the gable vents. Maybe it's
flowing in because more air is flowing out of the can vents?
Someone responded elsewhere in this thread: "when they did my new roof they
closed the gable vents and put in ridge
vents along with the soffits already there." Why would they close the gable
vents if, as you are proposing, they would have made the ventilation more
effective? It may have as much to do, or more, with the relative position of
the different vents as how many vents there are. I don't know, but it sounds
Yes, the plywood. The shingles look fine. Looking at the outside of the roof
you'd never guess there was a problem.
We have an upstairs and a downstairs bathroom. The upstairs bathroom is the
one that is used 99% of the time for showering and bathing and it is
unvented. I'm told this is because it has a window that opens so venting is
not required by code. The downstairs bathroom is vented. I'm not sure if
it's vented into the attic or through the attic and out a vent. Since it
hardly ever gets used, though, I guessing it wouldn't matter one way or the
Good idea...I hadn't thought of that. Thanks.
Exactly which way the air flows at any given time is probably a complex
issue depending on among other things, wind speed and direction. If a
strong wind is blowing at a gable, then yes, I would expect air to be
going in, instead of out. And I still believe that with adequate
soffit vents, adding more vents in the upper atttic, whether gable,
can, ridge, power, etc will only make things better, not worse.
Because there are various theories to optimum ventilation and you can
find roofers that subscribe to one or more of them. The idea here is
that some air will come in from the gables and flow out the ridge,
rather than have the air flow all the way up from the soffits, which is
optimal. There are two factors here. One is if this does in fact
occur, or does most of the air really follow the logical path from
soffits up and out. The second is, how big of a factor is it? I
could see it possibly causing the ventilation to be less than optimal,
but that is a long way from being able to create a problem like yours
with rot due to moisture. I've never heard of moisture rot in an attic
with any reasonable amount of ventilation, unless there was some other
major defect creating a source of moisture. And I would say your attic
with two gables, can vents, and soffit vents is reasonably vented,
provided they are all unblocked and an adequate amount.
Speaking of blocking, have you made sure the soffits are open? It's
very common for insulation to be pushed up against them to totally
block them. There are plastic baffles available that will keep the
Do you have a vapor barrier on the insulation? Considering the
problems you are having, I'd definitely get a bath vent installed, as
all that moisture has to go somewhere. IS the failing roof area near
> I'd get a good home inspector in to take a look at the problem and
Frankly, the assertion that installing extra venting has somehow caused
moisture buildup leading to damage seems bogus to me. And I would be
very surprised if the guy who "negligently failed" to close off the
gable vents will accept it without some proof beyond "this other guy
said so." Nor should he, IMHO.
If the thesis is true, it seems to me the damage should show a pattern
related to the allegedly short-circuited air flow. Is there such a
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form email@example.com.
Well, I don't subscribe to the thesis, so it's kinda hard for me to
say, but I would think it would be concentrated around the areas that
are no longer getting adequate ventilation as a result of the gable
vents. So it would presumably be away from the gables and near the
soffits (i.e. low on the roofline), particularly at the ends of the
house toward the offending gables. But somebody who actually believes
in the theory should be better able to say.
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form firstname.lastname@example.org.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 20:01:55 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
I don't think the post that follows sounds bad, but if so I apologize.
This particular topic, or at what I related it to, raises my blood,
for reasons you'll be able to figure out when you read my reply. And
I got all caught up in it. But now that I'm NOT writing, I've cooled
off. I don't see anything that should be rewritten, but I can't tell
how it will sound to someone else. I apologize if it has too much
punch to it.
If the new guy is right, you make a good point.
In one way yes, but to me, in another way, no. Charging for doing
something one is not supposed to do, for me, is worse than not
charging for not doing something one is supposed to do. For one
thing, motives are suspect in my mind when the person gets more money
for his mistake. Mere incompetence is not only something I try to
tolerate, it is something I expect, given what things have happened to
To the extent that one is paying for an expert opinion, they are
probably the same, but I never trust anyone's expert opinion anyhow.
(I rely on it when I have to, but I never trust it.)
This may have started when I was 13 and was malpracticed on by the
first of several doctors, all about different things, and none of
which caused me any permanent harm, thank goodness.
But I was treated, given drugs, by two doctors including a neurologist
for epilepsy when I never had it. And one of the two, my gp, failed
to immobilize my arm when I dislocated it (all he did is xray to see
if there was a fracture) and if he had, maybe I wouldn't have had 40
later dislocations and required surgery.
Another doctor at a local little clinic told me I had appendicitis and
was ready to do surgery that afternoon, or hand me over to someone,
but I went to a specialist on York Avenue, and he saw the *bruise*
right there where the soreness was!!! I was only about 20 pounds
overweight then, but the fat was in just the right spot that even when
I knew there was a black and blue mark there, I couldn't manage to see
it. (well maybe I should have tried a mirror :-) but I was in a
doctor's office. ) But that first doctor should have seen it. I had
no "rebound tenderness" I think they call it, just soreness from the
bruise. (I have no idea how or when I got the bruise.)
An orthopedist in a foreign country didn't set my broken leg right,
but a different one in the same city did so a week later, after I had
the sense to get a second opinion (because I couldn't stand up for
more than 10 minutes because of the excruciating pain at that point.)
The second orthopedist wanted to know the name of the first one,
because he had done such a bad job. I think now that I should have
There are another couple incidents I can't think of right now.
A teeny one: in high school my GP had me soak my inflamed ingrown big
toes in potassium permangenate every night for weeks, but I think it
was known already that KHMnO3 or whatever the formula is doesn't
actually help inflammations. It just wasn't known when he went to
medical school. It didn't wash off and I had red feet for weeks. At
least I never spilled it on the carpet, and it was in the winter so no
one laughed at me. ;-)
My girlfriend has simliar stories, and yet we both go to the doctor
when we're sick, because not going would be more reckless.
So if someone fails to nail a sheet of plywood where he should, I
think I got off easy. I don't think it is as bad as actually giving
drugs for something I didn't have. I know this is apples and oranges,
but these doctors and other non-doctors have shaped my feelings. So I
don't think doing and not doing are the same.
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:52:16 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
I am not a pro, just a shlepper here.
Are can vents like roof fans, but without the fan?
It seems to me, that if you have a room with 40 people and one door,
then all 40 people will leave through that door, but if you put in a
second door, then maybe 22 people will leave through the first door
and 18 will leave thorugh the other door. So each will be less
effective than the first door was. But for the life of me, I can't
see how two doors or more vents could, in total, be less effective
than one door or one set of vents.
Of course, I'm no pro or anything. I don't even know what a can vent
is. (Is it anything like a convent?)
This also makes me wonder how you could have too much condensation
*because* of too many vents. Is condensation caused by other things
than taking showers and maybe cooking in the house below? The
instructuions for my roof fan said that I should provide a manual
switch to turn it on when it is humid in the attic, even if it isn't
hot in the attic. That was 23 years ago. Maybe by now there would be
a humidity switch.
I think the more common term is roof line vents. They're the little square
vents that are placed parallel to the ridgeline and a couple feet below.
They are not powered.
Apparently it's the placement of the vents and not the number of vents
that's causing a problem. Ideally the cooler air should be entering at the
lowest point, which woudl be the soffits, and exiting at the highest point
which would be the ridge or roof line vents. The gable vents are interfering
with this flow of air. I guess it's like having a pipe with a leak in the
middle...not everything that goes in one end is going to exit the other end.
We do have a powered attic fan that runs off a thermostat. The fellow who
diagnosed the vent problem commented that a powered fan should not be
necessary for the small area we're talking about. It was installed by the
previous owners who tended to overdo things.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 00:14:24 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
OK. Closer to square sardine cans. I was thinking of spinach cans.
Well, I see what you mean, but I would want to hear this from a second
person who does this or designs this. I can imagine a house with cross
ventilation, especially on the second floor there will be a breeze.
Say a third window or fourth gets opened in a room in the middle. Is
that really going to lead to less fresh air in the second floor? I
can hardly believe that.
BTW, do you also have soffit vents?
Baloney. This seems like a not-unusual belief, and roof fans
themselves are not that common, IME, but my experience runs counter to
the notion that powered roof fans are not tremendously valuable. My
townhouse is only 700 sq. feet per floor. I have a ridge vent that
runs the whole width of the house, an inverted V with outlets towards
the front and towards the back. I have soffitt vents that run the
whole width of the house, both in the front and in the back of the
I live in Baltimore, and whenever the high on a given day was 80 or
more outside, it was too hot when I got home from work to go upstairs,
and too hot to sleep there, without using AC, which I normally don't
use. I would stay downstairs, sleep in the basement, and go up in
the morning to wash and change clothes. After about three months of
that, I got the fan in in early September and the temp of the second
floor went down from about 95 to 85. The temp of the attic went down
from 140 or 150 to about 95 or 100. It wasn't too hot up there to
work at my desk, and later, by not covering myself up with a blanket
and sometimes not wearing clothes, I was able to be quite comfortable
sleeping. Without AC. Even when the high was 95 or 100 on a given
BTW, after about 15 years with the fan, I was up there looking at
something and saw that my soffitt screens were covered the width of
the house with a layer, something like the layer on a drier lint
screen. It peeled or brushed off. Made from floating plant seeds and
I don't know what else. ISTM that shows how much more circulation
there was to my attic with the fan than anyone without a fan gets.
There is one new townhouse development near me. I think that each
"house" is two houses, one facing the front and the other facing the
back. And each roof of these two houses has 4, well now I have to go
look again. I thought they were fans, but maybe they are just vents.
When I went to look the first time, I talked to two owners and neither
knew what he had on his roof!!
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 00:14:24 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
geline and a couple feet below.
I read your answer to me first, but now I've read some other answers.
I might be convinced eventually that the gables should be closed, but
no way is the roof fan not the best part of ventilation that you have.
The temp of my upstairs and the lint on my soffit vents proves that to
What I would do, starting now, would be to keep a chart of the outside
day time temp, maybe just the high, and whether it is sunny, partly
cloudy, etc. (because solar radiation is at least as important as air
temp), and what the temp in the attic is. If it is too hard to go up
there you could measure the temp say, one foot from the ceiling (but
that only works if you don't have the AC on. If you have the AC on,
that will control the temp in the second floor.)
Then, when the gables are shut (in a manner that can be undone,
because there is no need under any theory I can think of for anything
more permanent.) you can continue to keep this chart, and I think 5 or
10 days of data before and 5 or 10 days after the gables are shut will
be enough to show a clear difference, if there is one.
BTW, what problem are you trying to solve? Why do you have men
looking at the attic at all? Was this comment offhand, or in response
to a particular problem? Often times we find that deep background
(well, not as deep as where you spent your honeymoon) can be a big
factor in answers.
We had a new "25 year" roof put on 12 years ago. The house was originally
built with soffit vents and gable vents. When the new roof was put on the
roofer added the roofline vents. The plywood is now rotted because of
condensation and the roof will have to be replaced again. I had a different
roofer come out to try and determine what had caused this to happen. It was
his opinion that is was due to the gable vents not being closed off when the
roofline vents were installed. We are the second owners of the house. We
never had condensation problems in the attic until after the old roof was
replaced. The previous owners took very good care of the house and I doubt
they would have not fixed a problem like that.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 19:48:31 -0700, "Sidney Schwartz"
You may have said that already somewhere, but thanks for repeating it.
I have a friend who was talking about a new roof, I think, and I
rushed to remind him that he should get a roofline vent. Then when I
was there later, I saw he had gable vents, so I weakened what I had
told him. The gable of course is not all the way at the top, like the
OTOH, fressh air could be coming in through the soffitts**, and the
gables and even the ridge vent, and all of it blowing out because of
the powered fan. I think that would be fine too.
**Oh, yeah, make sure the soffitts aren't obstructed by insulation.
Did the roofer who came recently look at that?
If you have time, Before it gets too hot, go up in the middle of the
day, or 10AM or 4 or 5 or 6 PM with a cigarette or something else
that makes smoke** and check out the air currents.
**I don't mean to smoke it, but they seem to make smoke sometimes just
by being lit. There must be something non-flammable that is visible.
You didn't bring this up, but as an aside, if you are looking for him
to share the cost of the new roof, as opposed to just coming over for
an hour and blocking off the gables, I suspect another problem you
have legally is that you had 12 years to notice the problem and
mitigate damages. I don't know if you knew or should have known that
you had condensation, or that the condensation was damaging the wood,
but I think that would be relevant.
OTOH if there really are different theories of attic ventilation among
pros (I am no pro) your 12-year ago roofer probably wouldn't be found
negligent. Sometimes no one is negligent, even when things don't work
The thing is, I'd expect bad venting to contribute to a shorter
shingle-life, but it's not at all clear to me that it's a proximate
cause of mold and rot. That would require leaks, or venting some
appliance into the attic space, else where did the water come
from in the first place?
Well, it looks like what I was told about the gable vents interfering with
the roof louvers (roof line vents) is correct. I called the roofer who
installed the roof and asked him about this. He did not dispute that the
gable vents probably should have been sealed, but said that this was "new
technology" that was not known when our roof was done. This may be the case,
I don't know yet.
Also, a pamphlet put out by the Air Vent company confirms that too many
vents, if they are of incompatible types, can interfere with each other. The
example they use is roof louvers interfering with a ridge vent. I don't see
why the same wouldn't be true of gable vents and roof louvers. The gable
vents are supposed to be exhaust vents and so are the roof louvers. Here's a
link to the pamphlet...
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.