Rivers etc

More likely plant difference.

I suspect bark eating here is Winter months

And its not just eucs either, most of the shrubs arent eucs.

Reply to
jon lopgel
Loading thread data ...

Yes, it did. The evidence is all there. Go and find it.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Its clear that Lopgel is simply another person from whom the truth is whatever his ideology states it is, and evidence to the contrary is simply 'uninformed opinion'.

He isn't worth arguing with.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Ah. Proof by assertion.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Something has made a mess of my newly planted Osmanthus bush.

At about rabbit height.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

It happens here all the time although deer are just as much of a nuisance

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

That isn't what was said. The claim was that dredging raised the river level, not the bank level.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

formatting link

Reply to
Chris Hogg

No it did not in the parts of Oz where the recent bushfires happened.

That sort of burning did happen and continues to happen in the tropics but that isnt where the recent bushfires happened,

And there continues to be extensive risk reduction burning by whites in the areas where the recent bushfires happened.

Reply to
jon lopgel

How odd that you cant actually present a shred of evidence of any 'busily digging out the roots of native vegetation, and ring-barking shrubs.

Yep, you just attempt to bullshit and lie and fool no one.

Reply to
jon lopgel

And the original claim by some ignorant pom half a world away, isnt ?

Reply to
jon lopgel

Doesn't say anything about digging out the roots of native vegetation or ring barking shrubs either.

Reply to
jon lopgel

It doesn?t here.

They arent here either.

Reply to
jon lopgel

For some odd reason we don?t actually get many of those in graziers paddocks here.

Reply to
jon lopgel

Semantics? The raised banks *allow* greater flow rates?

Reply to
Tim Lamb

Local estate management organised a *tree planting geographic barrier* around the inside of a 20 acre arable field here. (edge of village and enclosed by highway).

Rabbits and possibly Muntjac deer have destroyed some of the softwoods now the tree protectors have failed. Scots Pine seems immune.

>
Reply to
Tim Lamb

Try this then " In drought times rabbits climb trees to forage on the foliage and often ringbark trees in their search for moisture.

Rabbits are destroying many of our native plants. They eat seedlings and can kill 2.5 metre to 3.5 metre high shrubs by ring-barking them." From

formatting link
Rabbit warrens will disturb tree roots, weaken the trees and cause them to die in drought conditions or simply blow over in strong winds. ICBA to look for rabbits digging out roots, but if your denial is anything like as wrong as your comment about them not ring barking shrubs, the there's almost certainly a reference out there.

Reply to
Chris Hogg

That's complete bullshit.

Ring barking isnt done to search for moisture.

In fact f*ck all do that.

Nothing like the original stupid claim.

Reply to
jon lopgel
<snip>

<snip>

No it isn't, it's just Speed cowering behind another alias.

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

No. its nothing to do with that. The deeper rivers allow greater flow rates. For the same river level

The purpose of dredging is NOT to raise river banks. It is to deepen rivers. Idiot

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.