Redundant filling stations

As against big jugs I assume?

Cheers Clive

Reply to
Clive Summerfield
Loading thread data ...

In article , stuart noble horse's mouth. Has it put you off property developing as a career?

I was having pipe dreams about the workshop. The house could be ok too, with a deal of work.

Reply to
Dave Plowman

Any idea why not? It cannot be a structural reason and houses are often built on these old sites.

Adam

adamwadsworth@(REMOVETHIS)blueyonder.co.uk

Reply to
ARWadsworth

all questions answered here

formatting link

Reply to
Chris Oates

In article , IMM writes

Did you mean big tank tops ?

Reply to
Andrew

No idea to be honest, although I can make plenty of informed guesses. I've not seen houses built with tanks left in situ for ages, so I am only presuming that it is still the case.

If you removed the tanks they were happy, if you left them in situ they were not, even if you provided armfuls of certificates.

Reply to
Doctor D.

A tank filled with concrete is one hell of a firm foundation. What are they griping over?

Reply to
IMM

I may not be classed as firm if only half the house is over the tank. Personally I would have to remove the tank and then I could have a cellar.

-- Adam

adamwadsworth@(REMOVETHIS)blueyonder.co.uk

Reply to
ARWadsworth

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.