wash with a kettle?
nner in a savings account at the start of the year they wouldn't have to bo rrow in the first place.
sponsible enough to save anything.
ould be used for at the time or at a later date.
No, having no spare money or too little to be worth saving is differnt from having spare money and not saving it.
No. Having little money and not being responsible are different. It doesn't take much to understand this.
ote:
sh with a kettle?
r in a savings account at the start of the year they wouldn't have to borro w in the first place.
nsible enough to save anything.
Congratulations on stating the bleeding obvious.
I'm glad this is obvious to you now, since it wasn't earlier today.
wash with a kettle?
nner in a savings account at the start of the year they wouldn't have to bo rrow in the first place.
sponsible enough to save anything.
welcome to the idiot filter.
Well, you're the expert in idiocy.
*Plonk*
They are also unsecured loans, The borrower has no assets that could be liquidated to pay the loan back if there is a "problem".
Who are these people who can magically find a plumber on Wednesday that will available before Friday payday?
Never said it was a realistic scenario just "as advertised".
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required